Effective evaluation is a complex pro cess. Here's a look at the tasks that must be addressed when developing an effective and valid structure for such a process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bolton, Dale L.Evaluating Administrative Personnel in School Systems. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1980.
2.
Bottoni, Wayne R. "How To Evaluate and Improve Principal's Performance." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National School Boards Association, Houston, Tex. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 247 644), 1984.
3.
Carnes, Margaret L. "Evaluating Administrative Performance." Educational Research Service, Inc. (Research Report No. 21921714). Arlington, Va.: ERS, 1985.
4.
Croghan, John H., and Lake, Dale G.Competencies of Effective Principals and Strategies for Implementation. Occasional Papers in Educational Policy Analysis. Paper Number 411. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 251 965), Research Triangle Park, N. C.: Southeastern Regional Council for Educational Improvement, November 1984.
5.
. Strategic Consideration for Improving the Principalship. Occasional Papers in Educational Policy Analysis: Paper Number 411. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 251 965), Research Triangle Park, N. C. : Southeastern Regional Council for Educational Improvement , November 1984.
6.
Duke, Daniel L., and Stiggins, Richard J. "Evaluating the Performance of Principals: A Descriptive Study." Educational Administration Quarterly , Fall 1985.
7.
ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.Principal Evaluation. Research Action Brief, Number 12. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 193 742), September 1980.
8.
Greenfield, William D.Research on School Principals: An Analysis. Paper presented at the National Conference on Principals sponsored by the National Institute of Education, Washington, D.C. Monograph: The Effective Principal Research Summary. Reston, Va.: NASSP, 1982.
9.
Hall, Gene; Rutherford, William L.; Hord, Shirley M.; and Huling, Leslie L. "Effects of Three Principal Styles on School Improvement." Educational Leadership, February 1984.
10.
Hathaway, Walter E. "What Research Tells Us About the Nature of Schools That Are Exceptionally Effective in Improving Student Achievement and About the Role of the Principal in Creating and Supporting Them: Notes for Discussion with Portland, Oregon, Public Schools Principals." Merit Pay and Evaluation (Hot Topic Series, 1983-84, Number 2: 117-44). Bloomington, Ind.: Center on Evaluation Development and Research, Phi Delta Kappa.
11.
Hathorn, Joe.Principal Effectiveness: A Review of Literature To Supplement "The School Principal" and "The School Principal: Recommendations for Effective Leadership ." Association of California School Administrators, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No, ED 210779), 1980.
12.
Herman, Jerry J. "Evaluating Administrators: Assessing the Competencies." NASSP Bulletin, May 1988.
13.
—. "Heartland Area Education Agency 11: Management Evaluation and Compensation Plan." Johnston, Iowa, 1985.
14.
Jones, Ronald W. "A Comparison of the Critical Work Activities of School Administrators in the Iowa School Improvement Model." Master's thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, 1985 .
15.
Lezotte, Larry.The Effective School Report from Research and Practice. New York, N.Y.: Kelwynn, Inc., 1985 .
16.
Look, Ellen E.Selecting Criteria for Evaluation of School Principals Based Upon Item Discrimination Power and Job Situation. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames,1983.
17.
Snyder, Karolyn J., and Johnson, William L.Instructional Leadership Effectiveness: A Research Analysis and Strategy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, La. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No, ED 247636), 1984.
18.
Walters, Donald L. "The Measurement of Administrative Competencies." Phi Delta Kappan, February 1980.
