Staff development programs abound, but there appear to be few clear paths for principals who may wish to help classroom teachers improve teaching and learning. These writers con ducted a study of Ohio principals, and their findings provide justification for considering a selected set of ele ments to help teachers improve instruction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Doyle, W., and Ponder, G.A. "The Practical Ethic in Teacher Decision Making." Interchange3(1978): 1-12.
Emmer, E.; Evertson, C.; Sanford, J.; Clements, B.; and Worsham, M.Organizing and Managing the Junior High Classroom. Austin, Tex.: The Research Development Center for Teacher Education, 1981.
5.
Fenstermacher, G.D., and Soltis, J.F.Approaches to Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press, 1986.
6.
Hunter, M.Mastery Teaching. El Segundo, Calif.: TIP Publications, 1983.
7.
Kerman, S., and Martin, M.Teacher Expectation of Student Achievement—TESA. Bloomington, Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa, 1980 .
8.
McGreal, T.Successful Teacher Evaluation. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1983.
9.
Medley, D.M.Teacher Competency and Teacher Effectiveness: A Review of Process-Product Research. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1977.
10.
Slavin, R.E. "A Case Study of Psychological Research Affecting Classroom Practice: Student Team Learning" The Elementary School Journal1(1981): 4-17.