Here's a model designed to help principals understand their role as an instructional supervisor, while at the same time helping teachers understand the nature of the evaluation process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beach, Don M., and Reinhartz, Judy. "Using Criteria of Effective Teaching to Judge Teacher Performance." NASSP Bulletin, November 1984.
2.
Embretson, Gary; Ferber, Ellen; and Langager, Terry. "Supervision and Evaluation: Helping Teachers Reach Their Maximum Potential" NASSP Bulletin, Febuary 1984.
3.
Fredrich, G.H. "Supervision and Evaluation: Recognizing the Difference Can Increase Value, Effectiveness." NASSP Bulletin, November 1984.
4.
Goldhammer, Robert; Anderson, Robert H.; and Krajewski, Robert J., Clinical Supervision : Special Methods for the Supervision of Teachers, 2d ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1980.
5.
Joyce, Bruce, and Showers, Beverly. "Improving Inservice Training: The Messages of Research." Educational Leadership, February 1980.
6.
Manatt, Richard P. "Evaluating and Improving Teacher Performance." Inservice Training Program, Montana State University, Bozeman, June 1984.
7.
McCarty, Donald J.; Kaufman, Johanna W.; and Stafford, Julie C. "Supervision and Evaluation, Two Irreconcilable Processes?" The Clearing House, April 1986 .
8.
Petrie, Thomas A. "Ideas That Hinder Evaluation—Debunking the Myths." NASSP Bulletin, December 1982.
9.
Reyes, Donald J. "Bringing Together Teacher Evaluation, Observation, and Improvement of Instruction." The Clearing House, February 1986.
10.
Reinhartz, Judy, and Beach, Don M. "A Comprehensive Supervision Model for Promoting Professional Development ." The Clearing House, April 1987.
11.
Sergiovanni, Thomas J., The Principal-ship: A Reflective Practice Perspective. Boston, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon, 1987.
12.
Sweeney, Jim, and Manatt, Dick. "A Team Approach to Supervising the Marginal Teacher." Educational Leadership, April 1984.
