This writer poses several questions that have strong implications for curriculum planning, and asks the read er to consider how the central topic or deeper con cern of each question should be transformed to meet the needs of individual practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Schubert, W.H. "Historical Perspective on Centralizing Curriculum." In The Politics of Curriculum Decision Making: Issues in Centralizing Curriculum , edited by M.F. Klein.Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1991.
2.
—. "The Question of Worth as Central to Curricular Empowerment." In Teaching and Thinking About Curriculum, edited by J.T. Sears and J.D.Marshall. New York: Teachers College Press, 1990.
3.
—. "Acknowledging Teachers' Experiential Knowledge: Reports from the Teacher Lore Project" Kappa Delta Pi Record26 (1990): 99-100.
4.
—. Curriculum: Perspective, Paradigm, and Possibility. New York: Macmillan,1986.
5.
—. "Knowledge About Out-of-School Curriculum" Educational Forum45 (1981):185-99.
6.
—. Curriculum Books: The First Eighty Years. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1980.
7.
Schubert, W.H., and Ayers, W., eds. Teacher Lore: Learning from Our Own Experience . White Plains, N.Y.: Longman, forthcoming.
8.
Schubert, W.H., and Lopez-Schubert, A.L. "Teaching Curriculum Theory." TheJournal of Curriculum Theorizing4 ( 1982): 97-111.
9.
Willis, G., and Schubert, W.H., eds. Reflections from the Heart of Educational Inquiry: Understanding Curriculum and Teaching Through the Arts. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1991.
