Carlson, Richard D.Adoption of Educational Innovations. Eugene, Oreg. : The Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration (CASEA), 1965.
2.
Cavanna, Anthony P. "A Recipe for Successful Computer Innovation." CSA Educational Review . New York: The Council of Supervisors and Administrators, October 1987.
3.
—. "Administrative Factors Which Affect Student Computer Use in Schools ." Ed.D. dissertation, Fordham University, 1986.
4.
—. "Improving Schools Through the Change Process. " CSA Educational Review. New York: The Council of Supervisors and Administrators, November 1988.
5.
Duckworth, Kenneth.Linking Educational Policy and Management with Student Achievement. Eugene, Oreg.: TheCenter for Educational Policy and Management , University of Oregon, September 1981.
6.
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structures as Myth and Ceremony ." American Journal of Sociology, September 1977.
7.
Meyer, John; Scott, Richard W.; and Deal, Terrence. "Institutional and Technical Sources of Organizational Structure: Explaining the Structure of Educational Organizations." Paper presented at the 1979 Conference of Human Service Organizations at the Center for Advanced Study in Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, Calif.
8.
Selvin, Dennis P. "The Innovation Boundary: A Specific Model and Some Empirical Results ." Administrative Science Quarterly, December 1971.
9.
Sheingold, Karen; Kane, Janet H.; and Endreweit, Mari E. "Microcomputer Use in Schools: Developing a Research Agenda." Harvard Educational Review, November 1983.