The problems today's school administrators face are far dif ferent from their predecessors'. Graduate schools must change their curricula to meet the needs of a new breed of administrator.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cawelti, G. "School Leadership." Educational Leadership43(1986):36.
2.
Farris, L., and Goor, H.Preparing Educational Leaders of the 80's. Washington, D.C.: Research for Better Schools, 1984.
3.
Fazio, T., and Cooper, L.Theory of Cognitive Dissonance Revisited. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
4.
Festinger, L.Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1957.
5.
Griffiths, D. "Some Thoughts About Theory in Educational Administration-1975." UCEA Review23(1975):51-125.
6.
Peterson, K., and Finn, C. "The Principal: Superintendent and Educational Administration." Public Interest14(1985):26-74.
7.
Thomson, Scott D. "Uncertain Images: Deans and School Administrators." Reston, Va.: NASSP, 1987.
8.
Willower, D.Theory and Educational Administration. Columbus, Ohio: University Council for Educational Administration, 1975 .
9.
Willower, D., and Culbertson, J.The Professorship in Educational Administration. Columbus, Ohio: University Council for Educational Administration , 1964.
