To date, 40 states have mandated minimum competency testing programs for students, and more than 30 have mandated com petency tests for teachers, administrators, and/or other educa tional personnel. This writer reviews a dozen basic questions about passing scores on these various tests, considering what is actually being done versus what should be done with reference to testing practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education Joint Committee. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association , 1985.
2.
Angoff, W.H. "Scales, Norms, and Equivalent Scores." In Educational Measurement, 2nd ed., edited by R. L. Thorndike. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1971.
3.
Berk, R.A. "Determination of Optimal Cutting Scores in Criterion-Referenced Measurement ." Journal of Experimental Education45(1976):4-9.
4.
. " A Consumer's Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-Referenced Tests." Review of Educational Research56(1986a):137-72.
5.
. " Minimum Competency Testing: Status and Potential." In The Future of Testing, edited by B. S. Plake and J. C. Witt.Hillsdale, N.J. : Erlbaum, 1986b.
6.
Georgia Association of Educators v. Nix. 407 F. Supp. 1102, 1976.
7.
Jaeger, R.M. "Certification of Student Competence." In Educational Measurement, 3rd ed., edited by R. L. Linn.Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education and National Council on Measurement in Education , in press.
8.
Livingston, S.A., and Zieky, M.J.Passing Scores: A Manual for Setting Standards of Performance on Educational and Occupational Tests. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1982.
9.
Saunders, J.C., and Mappus, L.L. "Accuracy and Consistency of Expert Judges in Setting Passing Scores on Criterion-Referenced Tests: The South Carolina Experience." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 1984.
10.
United States v. State of North Carolina. 425 F. Supp. 789 (E.D.N.C.), 1977.
11.
United States v. State of South Carolina. 15 FEP Cases 1196 (D.C.S.C.), 1977.
12.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Civil Service Commission,
13.
U.S. Department of Labor, and U. S. Department of Justice. "Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures." Federal Register43(1978):38,290-309. Yalow, E.S., and Popham, W.J.Appraising the Pre-Professional Skills Test for the State of Texas (Report No. 5): Standards Advisors Performance Standards Recommendations. Culver City, Calif.: IOX Assessment Associates, August 1983.
