These writers reflect on what was expected from language labo ratories 25 years ago, what lessons have been learned, and what these lessons mean for present language teachers and school administrators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bloomfield, L.Outline Guide for the Practical Study of Foreign Language. Baltimore, Md.: Linguistic Society of America, 1942.
2.
Freedman, E.S."An Investigation into the Efficacy of the Language Laboratory in Foreign Language Teaching."Audio-Visual Language Journal 7 (1969).
3.
Jalling, H."The Use of Language Laboratories in University Teaching."2ndAILA Congress, Cambridge, England, 1969.
4.
Keating, R.F."A Study of the Effectiveness of Language Laboratories" (Keating Report)New York: Institute of Administrative Research, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1963.
5.
Lado, R.Language Teaching: A Scientific Approach. New York : McGraw-Hill, Inc.,1964.
6.
Lorge, S.W."Foreign Language Laboratories in Secondary Schools."Audio-Visual Learning, vol. VII, no. 1. New York: Board of Education of the City of New York, 1963.
7.
Yorkey, R.C.Study Skills for Students of English as a Second Language. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
