Curriculum evaluation can hold fewer pitfalls for those doing the evaluation if certain issues are recognized and minimized. This writer looks at 14 such issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Charters, W.W., Jr. , and Jones, J.E. "On the Risk of Appraising Non-Events in Program Evaluation." Educational Researcher2 (1973): 5-7.
2.
Hall, Gene E., and Louks, S.F. "A Developmental Model for Determining Whether the Treatment Is Actually Implemented." American Educational Research Journal14 (1977): 263-276.
3.
Kinghorn, John R "We Agree Workshop for Small-Group Leaders Plus Two Additional Group Skill Activities." /I/D/E/A/ Staff Paper. Dayton, Ohio : Institute for Development of Educational Activities , Inc., 1974.
4.
Sava, Samuel G. "Forward to Basics." Vital Speeches49 (1975): 219-222.
5.
Scriven, M. "Pros and Cons About Goal-Free Evaluation." Evaluation Comment3 (1972): 1-4.
6.
Stufflebeam, Daniel I., et al. Educational Evaluation and Decision Making. Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc., 1971.
