The training model described here integrates administrative tasks, processes, and characteristics. It provides a flexible and realistic framework to improve administrator performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Hersey, Paul W. "What's Happening with NASSP's Assessment Center?" Reston, Va.: NASSP, 1978.
2.
Lipham, J.M., and Hoeh, J.A., Jr. The Principalship: Foundations and Functions. New York : Harper & Row, 1974.
3.
McCleary, Lloyd E.An Essay on Role Attrition: Three Studies of the Job of the Principal. Ogden, Utah: University of Utah, 1971.
4.
Rosenburg, M. "How To Evaluate Your Principals Without Scaring (or Turning) Them Off." American School Board Journal, 1973.
5.
Sergiovanni, T.J.; Burlingame, J.; Coombs, F.D.; and Thurston, P.W.Educational Governance and Administration. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
6.
SouthernStates Cooperative Program in Educational Administration. Better Teaching in School Administration . Nashville, Tenn.: George Peabody College, 1955.
7.
Stansberry, I.The Development and Field-Testing of an Instrument for Assessing the Functions of the School Principal. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Dissertation Abstracts International, University Microfilms, 1976.
