The results of a survey of students and supervisors in science revealed that students need to be more actively involved in instruction that applies concepts to technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Clarke, Arthur C.Profiles of the Future. New York: Harper and Row, 1973.
2.
Commoner, Barry.Science And Survival. New York: Viking Press, 1966.
3.
Crouse, William Harry.Understanding Science. New York: McGraw Hill, 1963.
4.
Dewey, John.Democracy and Education. New York: The MacMillan Co., 1916.
5.
Fiske, Edward B.Review of the National Assessment of Education Progress Report. New York Times, 19 November, 1981.
6.
Kushel, Gerard, and Maddon, Constance A.Fact and Folklore—Social and Psychological Foundations of Teaching. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1974.
7.
McGlaughlin, Frances.The Mediate Teacher. Philadelphia, Pa.: North American Publishing Co., 1975.
8.
Oettinger, Anthony G. Run, Computer Run—The Mythology of Educational Innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press , 1969.
9.
Rybczynski, Witold.Paper Heroes: A Review of Appropriate Technology. New York : Anchor Press, 1980.
10.
Toffler, Alvin.Future Shock. New York: Bantam Books , 1970.
11.
Toffler, Alvin.Learning For Tomorrow— The Role of the Future in Education. New York: Bantam Books, 1976.
12.
Toffler, Alvin.Future Shock—The Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books, 1980.
