Educators have not only overused and ineffectively used some sources of social power in the schools, says this educator, they have left other sources untapped. He suggests they consider options presented here.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Canter, L., and Canter, M.Assertive Discipline. Seal Beach, Calif.: Canter and Associates, 1976.
2.
Dinkmeyer, Don, and Dinkmeyer, Don, Jr. "Logical Consequences: A Key to the Reduction of Disciplinary Problems ." Phi Delta Kappan57( 1976):665-66.
3.
French, J., Jr., and Raven, B. "The Bases for Social Power." In Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, edited by D. Cart-wright and A. Zander.Evanston, Ill. : Row-Peterson, 1960.
4.
Gallup, George. "Twelfth Annual Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitudes Toward the Public Schools." Phi Delta Kappan62(1980):33-45.
5.
Glasser, William.Schools Without Failure. New York: Harper & Row, 1969. Note, Glasser's Reality Therapy is briefly outlined in Wolfgang , C., and Glickman, C.Solving Discipline Problems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon , 1980.
6.
Gordon, Thomas.Teacher Effectiveness Training. New York: David McKay Co., 1974; also Leader Effectiveness Training. New York: Peter H. Wyden , 1977.
7.
Rosenthal, R., and Jacobson, L.Pygmalion in the Classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968. An excellent update of this research is presented in Insel, P., and Jacobson, L.What Do You Expect ? An Inquiry into Self-Fulfilling Prophecies. Menlo Park, Calif.: Cummings Publishing Co., 1975.
8.
Tauber, Robert T., "Advice for the Principal: Applying a Learning Theory." NASSP Bulletin, January 1978, pp. 47-51.
