Administrators now have a tool for efficiently assessing critical aspects of teacher motivation, according to these writers. They ex plain this as sessment instru ment on these pages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blake, Robert B., and Mouton, Jane S.The Managerial Grid. Houston, Tex.: Gulf, 1964.
2.
Etzioni, Amitai.A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. New York : Free Press, 1961.
3.
Galbraith, Jay, and Cummings, L.L. "An Empirical Investigation of the Motivational Determinants of Task Performance: Interactive Effects Between Instrumentality—Valence and Motivation—Ability." Organizational Behavior and Human Performance2 (1967): 237-57.
4.
Herzberg, Frederick W. "Motivation Through Job Enrichment." In Motivation and Productivity, edited by Saul S. Gillerman.Washington, D.C.: BNA Inc., 1967.
5.
Kimbrough, Ralph B., and Nunnery, Michael Y.Educational Administration—An Introduction . New York: Macmillan Co., 1976, p. 146.
6.
Knezevich, Stephen J.Administration of Public Education. 3d ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1975 , pp. 144-47.
7.
Lawler, Edward E., III, and Porter, Lyman W. "Antecedent Attitudes of Effective Managerial Performance." Organizational Behavior and Human Performance2 (1967): 125.
8.
Lipham, James M., and Hoeh, James A.The Principalship: Foundations and Functions. New York : Harper & Row, 1974, p. 94.
9.
Matthews, Kenneth M. "Improving Academic Performance." Educational Forum , November 1979, p. 64.
10.
Matthews, Kenneth M., and Brown, Carvin L. "Schooling and Learning—The Principal's Influence on Student Achievement." NASSP Bulletin, October 1976, pp.1-15.
11.
Matthews, Kenneth M., and Chan, Tak Cheung. "Referent Differences in Pupil Motivation—Implications for Test Validity." Educational and Psychological Measurement , Summer 1980, pp. 531-36.
12.
McGregor, Douglas.Leadership and Motivation. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press, 1966.
13.
Vroom, Victor H.Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.
