Performance ap praisal theories from industry, writes this edu cator, may provide principals with in sight and commu nication pos sibilities in the supervision of teachers, specif ically in the appli cation of commu nication techniques in the post- observation conference.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boyd, Bradford B.Management-Minded Supervision. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
2.
Bradshaw, Pete. The Management of Self Esteem. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1981.
3.
Broadwell, Martin M.The Practice of Supervising: Making Experience Pay. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
4.
Donnelly, J.R.; Gibson, James L.; and Ivancevich, John M.Fundamentals of Management. Dallas, Tex.: Business Publications, 1975.
5.
Drucker, Peter F.Managing for Results. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
6.
Drucker, Peter F. Technology, Management, and Society: Essays by Peter F. Drucker. New York: Harper & Row, 1970 .
7.
Imundo, LouisV. The EffectiveSupervisor's Handbook. New York: Amacom, 1980.
8.
Lefton, Robert E., et al. Effective Motivation Through Performance Appraisal. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977.
9.
Maier, Norman R.The Appraisal Interview: Three Basic Approaches. La Jolla, Calif.: University Associates, 1976 .
10.
Maslow, A.H.Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
11.
McGregor, Douglas. Leadership and Motivation, Essays of Douglas McGregor, edited by Warren G. Bennis and Edgar H. Schein with Caroline McGregor. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1966.
12.
Olsen, Leif D., and Bennett, Addison C. "Performance Appraisal: Management Techniques or Social Process? Part 2. Social Process," Management Review , January 1976, pp. 22-28.
13.
Sergiovanni, Thomas J., ed. Supervision of Teaching. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1982.
