An alternative model for the supervision of teachers who are becoming more and more effective is described here after the author provides a critical look at the model currently used by many administrators.
_. " The Sad Condition of Education in the United States: Two Hypotheses and Two Suggestions." Paper presented at a symposium at the University of Pittsburgh, 1975.
3.
_. " Rationale for Clinical Supervision." Journal of Research and Development in Education9( 1976): 4-19.
4.
Eaker, Robert. "An Analysis of the Clinical Supervision Process as Perceived by Selected Teachers and Administrators." Doctoral dissertation, Knoxville, Tenn.: The University of Tennessee, 1972.
5.
Eye, Glen C.; Netzer, Lanore A.; and Krey, Robert D.Supervision of Instruction. 2d ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
6.
Goldhammer, Robert.Clinical Supervision. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.
7.
Gorman, Noreen. "A Study of Clinical Supervision as a Resource for College Teachers of English." Doctoral dissertation, Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh, 1971.
8.
Hagglund, Lyn. "Supervisory Practices in Lower Mainland School Districts: Theory and Research." Special Master's project. Burnaby: Simon Fraser University, 1978.
9.
Harris, Ben M. "Limits and Supplements to Formal Clinical Procedures." Journal of Research and Development in Education9( 1976): 85-88.
10.
_. "Strategies for Instructional Change: Promising Ideas and Perplexing Problems." In Supervisor: Agent for Change in Teaching. Washington, D.C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1966, pp. 85-95.
11.
Kerr, Thomas. "The Relationship Among Attitude Scores, Dogmatism Scores, and Change in a Classroom Teaching Pattern of Teachers Who Have Experienced Clinical Supervision." Doctoral dissertation, Philadelphia, Pa .: Temple University, 1976.
12.
Krajewski, Robert J. "Clinical Supervision : To Facilitate Teacher Selfimprovement." Journal of Research and Development in Education9 ( 1976): 58-66.
13.
Mattaliano, Anthony. "Clinical Supervision : The Key Competencies Required for Effective Practice." Doctoral dissertationBoston: University of Massachusetts, 1977.
14.
Mosher, Ralph L. and Purpel, David E.Supervision: The Reluctant ProfessionNew York: Houghton Mifflin, 1972 .
15.
Wilhelms, Fred T.Supervision in a New Key. Washington, D.C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1973.
