While countless facets of today's educational process are being improved, the problem of substitute teaching remains largely ignored. This writer contends that the typical substitute teacher program retains antiquated stop-gap measures of little value to a school.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Esposito, Frank J. "Improving the Role of Substitute Teachers." NASSP Bulletin, December 1975.
2.
Garwood, S. Gray. "Ten Ways To Prevent Classroom Chaos." Teacher, October 1976.
3.
Jentzen, Alan E. and Vockell, Edward L. "Substitute Teachers: Current Status and Some Suggestions for Improvement." NASSP Bulletin, March 1978.
4.
Keller, Keven. "Substitute Teachers." Arizona Educational Information System, May 1976.
5.
Kiefer, Charles C. "Retired Educators Can Provide an Untapped Source of Expertise." NASSP Bulletin, November 1976.
6.
Lester, Michael C. "Survival Guide for Substitutes." Saturday Review of Education, March 1973.
7.
Manlove, Donald C., and Elliott, Peggy. "Absent Teachers ... Another Handicap for Students?" The Practitioner . Reston, Va.: National Association of Secondary School Principals, May 1979.
8.
Miller, Peggy L. "To a Substitute: You Are a Professional Educator." Instructor, August 1974.
9.
Olson, Martin N. "Identifying Quality in School Classrooms: Some Problems and Some Answers ." Metropolitan School Study Council Special Report. January 1971.
10.
Porwoll, Paul J. "Practices and Procedures in the Use of Substitute Teachers." Educational Research Service, October 1977.
11.
Robb, Herbert E. "Decline and Fall of the Substitute Teacher." Journal of Teacher Education, March-April 1979.
12.
Secor, Joan. "From a Substitute: I Am a RealTeacher." Instructor, August 1974.
13.
Stashower, Gloria. "Is There a Substitute for Substitutes?" School Management , April 1974.
