Many school administrators lament that they do not have adequate time to supervise and evaluate instruction. This article presents a model which the writer says is intended to be more humanistic and clinical by involving teachers in the process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrell, Ronald L., "The Humanistic Supervisor Enhances Growth and Improves Instruction ." Educational Leadership, December 1974, pp. 212-216.
2.
Diamond, Stanley C. "Classroom Observation—A Means to Improve Instruction." NASSP Bulletin, December 1975, pp. 29-33.
3.
Eye, Glen G. "Supervisory Skills: The Evolution of the Art." The Journal of Educational Research, September 1975, pp. 14-19.
4.
Goens, George A., and Lange, Ronald W. "Supervision as Self-Management." NASSP Bulletin, December 1975, pp. 1-6.
5.
Husarik, Ernest A., and Wynkoop, Robert J. "A Principal's Dilemma: Can Supervising Be Collegial ." NASSP Bulletin, December 1974, pp. 13-19.
6.
Reavis, Charles A. "Clinical Supervision: A Timely Approach." Educational Leadership, February 1976, pp. 360-363.
7.
Richardson, Edward T. "My Thoughts: A Self-Evaluation Instrument." NASSP Bulletin, December 1975, pp. 7-17.
8.
Zelenak, Mel J., and Snider, Bill C. "Teachers Don't Resent Evaluation—If It's for the Improvement of Instruction." Phi Delta Kappan, April 1974 , pp. 570-571.
