This rebuttal may have been a long time in the making but the author wanted to be certain that his ideas made sense not only to himself but also to other science supervisors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Collea, P.; Fuller, R.; Karplus, R.; Poldy L.; and Renner, J. "Workshop on Physics Teaching and the Development of Reasoning." Document distributed by the American Association of Physics Teachers at the 1975 Annual Meeting, Anaheim, Calif.
2.
Friot, F.E. "The Relationship Between an Inquiry Teaching Approach and Intellectual Development." Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma , 1970.
3.
Higgens-Trenk, A., and Gaite, A.J.H.Elusiveness of Formal Operational Thought in Adolescents. Proceedings of the 75th Annual American Psychological Association Convention . Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 201-2.
4.
Kohlberg, L., and Gilligan, C. "The Adolescent as a Philosopher: The Discovery of the Self in a Postconventional World." Daedalus100 (1971): 1051-1084.
5.
McKinnon, J.W., and Renner, J.W. "Are Colleges Concerned with Intellectual Development?American Journal of Physics39 ( 1971): 1047-1052.
6.
Lawson, A.E., and Renner, J.W. "A Quantitative Analysis of Responses to Piagetian Tasks and Its Implication for Curriculum." Science Education58 (1974): 545-554.
7.
Woolman, W., and Karplus, R. "Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School V: Using Ratio in Differing Tasks." School Science and Mathematics74 (1974): 593-611.
8.
Piaget, J. "Cognitive Development in Children." Journal of Research in Science Teaching2 (1964): 180.
9.
Herron, D.J. "Piaget for Chemists." Journal of Chemical Education52 (1975): 146-150.
