The need for adminis trative leadership in instructional evalua tion and assessing teacher competence is becoming more evident. To that end, the author attempts to define some of the issues, provide in sights into the evalu ation process, and assist in determining guidelines for assess ment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brophy, Jere E., and Good, Thomas L.Teacher-Student Relationships; Causes and ConsequencesNew York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1974.
2.
Combs, Arthur W."Can We Measure Good Teaching Objectively?"NEA Journal , January 1974.
3.
Davis, O.L., Jr."Realism, Specificity, and Activity."Social Education . March 1970.
4.
Dunkin, Michael J., and Biddle, Bruce J.The Study of TeachingNew York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., 1974.
5.
Hughes, Marie M."What Teachers Do and the Way They Do It."NEA Journal . September 1964.
6.
Jackson, Philip W."The Difference Teachers Make," In How Teachers Make a DifferenceWashington, D.C.: Office of Education, 1971.
7.
Joyce, Bruce, and Weil, Marsha.Models of TeachingEnglewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1972.
8.
Medley, Donald M., Soar, Robert S., and Soar, Ruth.Assessment and Research in Teacher Education: Focus on PBTEWashington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1975.
Rosenshine, Barak, and Furst, Norma."Research on Teacher Performance Criteria." In Research in Teacher Education, edited by B. O. Smith. Englewood Cliffs; N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1971, pp. 37-72.
11.
Rubin, Louis J."Matching Teacher, Student, and Method."Today's Education. September 1973.
12.
Smith, B. Othanel."Teaching: Conditions of its Evaluation." The Evaluation of TeachingWashington, D.C.: Pi Lambda Theta, 1967.
13.
Wiles, Kimball, and Lovell, John T.Supervision for Better SchoolsEnglewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1975.
