One striking similarity to be found in the case his tories of many field innovations is the absence of a comprehensive plan for implementation. The au thors present guidelines and suggestions for educa tors who wish to implement and maintain innova tive programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Goodlad, J., and Klein, M.Behind the Classroom Door. Worthington, Ohio: Charles H. Jones Publishing, Co., 1970.
2.
Gordon, E.W., and Wilkerson, D.A.Compensatory Education for the Disadvantaged. New York : College Entrance Examination Board, 1966.
3.
Gross, N.; Giacquinta, J.; and Bernstein, M.Implementing Organizational Instruction. New York: Basic Books Inc., 1971.
4.
Jones, J.E.; Wacaster, C.T.; and Charters, W.W.The Process of Planned Change in the School's Instructional Organization. Monograph No. 25, Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, University of Oregon, 1973.
5.
Joyce, B.Alternative Models of Elementary Education. Toronto: Xerox College Publishing, 1969.
6.
Pellegrin, R., and Charters, W.W. AdministrativeAssumptions Underlying Major Innovation: A Case Study in the Introduction of Differentiated Staffing. The Process of Planned Change in the School's Instructional Organization. Monograph No. 25, Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, University of Oregon, 1973.
7.
Silberman, C.E.Crisis in the Classroom. New York: Random House, 1970.
8.
Smith, L., and Keith, P.Anatomy of Educational Innovation: An Organizational Analysis of an Elementary School.
