Evaluation continues to be a common concern at the secondary school level. Administrators and teachers are interested in the skill and ability levels of their students. In the following article, Iwanicki takes a careful look at the evaluation process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benne, K.D. "Democratic Ethics and Social Engineering," Progressive Education27 (1949): 204.
2.
Bloom, B.S.; Hastings, J.T.; and Madaus, G.F.Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
3.
Buros, O.K., ed The Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park, N.J.: Gryphon Press, 1973.
4.
Center for the Study of Evaluation. CSE Secondary School Test Evaluations . Los Angeles: UCLA Graduate School of Education, 1974.
5.
Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Determining Instructional Purposes. San Francisco, 1971.
Madaus, G.F., and Airasian, P.W. "Placement, Formative, Diagnostic, and Summative Evaluation of Classroom Learning" Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis , 1970.
8.
National Study of Secondary School Evaluation. Evaluative Criteria. Arlington, Va., 1969.
