This article describes four certification options for prin cipals : (I) traditional, (2) approved program, (3) intern ship, and (4) competency-based. The authors point out that the trend is toward greater flexibility. Internships will increase as more emphasis is placed on field experi ence and on-the-job performance, they say.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dederick, Warren E. "Competencies of the School Administrator ." Phi Delta Kappan, 54:349-50, Jan. 1973 .
2.
Getz, Howard , and others. "From Traditional to Competency-Based Teacher Education." Phi Delta Kappan, 54:300-302 Jan. 1973.
3.
Howsan, Robert B., Edgar L. Morphet. "Certification of Educational Administrators ." Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 9, March 1958.
4.
Johnson, Thomas J. "Implementing the Model." NASSP Bulletin, 56:42-52, March 1972.
5.
Lamb, Gene. "The California Competency-Based Program for Credentialling School Administrators." A preliminary report on the work-study proposals published by the Commission for Teacher Preparation and Licensing 1972-1973 , Sept. 1973, San Jose, Calif.
6.
McCleary, Lloyd E., Kenneth E. McIntyre. "Competency Development and University Methodology." NASSP Bulletin56:53-59, March 1972.
7.
State of Michigan, Department of Education. Personal correspondence between W. Robert Cornwell (consultant) and Dale Findley.
8.
Stinnett, T. M. AManual on Certification Requirements for School Personnel in the United States . Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1970.
9.
Woellner, Elizabeth H.Requirements for Certification, 38th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973.
