A serious lack of sophistication marks our efforts to combat drug abuse, the author believes. We must consider the complex relationships among the individual, drugs, and society to create effective drug education programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Personnel and Guidance Association."Ethical Standards,"Personnel and Guidance Journal, October 1961.
2.
Controlled Drugs. Bulletin 110, Connecticut State Department of Education, Hartford, Conn., 1970.
3.
Guidelines on School Centered Problems Related to Drug Use and Abuse.State of Minnesota, Department of Education,St. Paul, Minn., 1971.
4.
Guidelines for School Programs in the Prevention of Drug Abuse.The State Education Department, Special Unit on Health & Drug Education, Albany, N. Y. 12224, 1971.
5.
Legislative Assembly of the State of MontanaSenate Bill No. 29, Chapter No. 61, Helena, Mont., 1971.
6.
Leonard, Carol A. and Anglin, Samuel W."Issues, Attitudes, and Responses to Drug Use in Morris County, New Jersey"; Grassroots, Vol. 1, The National Coordinating Council on Drug Abuse Education, 1971.
7.
Lewis, David C."Drug Education,"NASSP Bulletin , No. 53, December 1969.
8.
Merton, Robert K.Social Theory and Social Structure revised and enlarged edition, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill., 1957.
9.
Nowlis, Helen H.Drugs on the College CampusAnchor Books, Doubleday & Co. Inc., New York, 1969.
10.
Rosenthal, Robert and Jacobson, Lenore.Pygmalion In the Classroom.Holt, Rinehart, & Winston; New York, 1968.
11.
School Drug Policies: A Guide for Administrators.Division of Curriculum and Instruction, Massachusetts Department of Education , Boston, Mass.
