Evaluation of the principal is in great demand in this era of accountability. The author sug gests that principals take an offensive position by developing their own evaluative criteria.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barrilleaux, Louis. "Behavioral Outcomes for Administrative Internships: School Principals ." Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. VIII, No. 1, Winter 1972, pp. 59-71.
2.
Barro, Stephen M. "An Approach to Developing Accountability Measures for the Public Schoo's ." Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. LII, No. 4, Dec. 1970, p. 60.
3.
Browder, Leslie, ed. Emerging Patterns of Administrative Accountability. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan Publishing Corporation, 1971, 571 pp.
4.
Drucker, Peter F. "Decision-Making and the Effective Executive." The Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, Vol. 52, No. 328, May 1968, pp. 24-39.
5.
Griffith, Daniel, Jr. Special Report to National Conference Professors Educational Administration, Bloomington, Ind., August, 1966.
6.
Hodgkinson, Harold L.Education in Social and Cultural Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1962 , p. 111.
7.
Katz, R.L. "Skills of an Effective Administrator." Harvard Business Review. Jan.-Feb. 1955, pp. 33-42.
8.
Mager, Robert F. and Peter Pipe.Analyzing Performance Problems. Belmont, Calif.: Fearon Publishers, 1970, pp. 1-109.
9.
Nelson, Norbert J.An address delivered at the Magnavox Executive Development Program, "Pursuit of Management Excellence,"Fort Wayne, Ind., Mar. 1969.
10.
Trump, J. Lloyd. "On Humanizing Schools." The Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, Vol. 56, No. 361, Feb. 1972, pp. 9-16.
11.
Trump, J.Lloyd and William Georgiades. "Which Elements of School Programs Are Most Difficult—And Why?" The Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, Vol. 55, No. 355, May 1971, pp. 54-68.
