Research is starting to show that not only can the effectiveness of the specialist be extended by making use of paraprofessionals, but that under certain circumstances the pupil personnel specialist can provide unquestionably satis factory service without direct contact with students themselves.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Coleman, James S. SocialClimates in High Schools. Cooperative Research Monograph No. 4. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1961.
2.
Loughary, John W., Robert O. Stripling, and Paul W. Fitzgerald .Counseling, a Growing Profession. Washington, D.C.: American Personnel and Guidance Association , 1965.
3.
Leton, Donald A.Concepts Which School Social Workers Hold of School Psychology. Report of the Committee on Relationship to Social Work, Division 16, American Psychological Association, 1958.
4.
Rector, William H., and Merville C. Shaw .Patterns of Attendance and Some Outcomes of Parent Group Counseling in Three Junior High Schools. Chico State College, Chico, Calif.: Western Regional Center of IRCOPPS, 1967. (Mimeo.)
5.
Shaw, Merville C.The Role of Theory in the Development of Guidance Programs. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Co., 1968 .
6.
and William H. Rector .Parent and Counselor Perceptions of Their Participation in Group Counseling. Monograph No. 3. Chico State College , Chico, Calif.: Western Regional Center of IRCOPPS, 1966.
7.
and John K. Tuel.A Proposed Model and Research Design for Pupil Personnel Services in the Public Schools. Monograph No. 1. Chico State College, Chico, Calif.: Western Regional Center of IRCOPPS, 1964.
8.
_ and John K. Tuel.Guidance Research in Action: Group Counseling with Parents . Monograph No. 2. Chico State College, Chico, Calif.: Western Regional Center of IRCOPPS, 1965.
9.
and John K. Tuel. "A Focus for Public School Guidance Programs: A Model and Proposal." Personnel and Guidance Journal. April 1966, pp. 824-830.
