Ballou, Frank W.The Size of Sections in High Schools. In High School Organization, pp. 4-34. Yonkers, N. Y.: World Book Co., 1914.
2.
Bray, Samuel E.Size of Class in Ordinary School. In School Organization, pp. 62-74. London : W. B. Clive.1911.
3.
Brown, John F.The Number of Pupils in Each Class. In The American High School, p. 161. New York : The Macmillan Co.1909.
4.
Chancellor, William E.Classifying, Marking, Grading, and Promoting Pupils. In Class Teaching and Management, pp. 199-232. New York: Harper and Brothers.1910.
5.
Perry, Arthur C.The Size of the Class. In Management of a City School, p. 181. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1908.
6.
Strayer, George D.Size of Class in Elementary Schools and High Schools In Some Problems in City School Administration, pp. 94-97. Yonkers, New York : World Book Co., 1916.
7.
American City Bureau. Know and Help Your Schools.Second Report. An interpretation of Inquiry No. 11, relating to school buildings and grounds, enrollment, and size of class in the national survey of urban, public schoolsNew York: American City Bureau, March, 1921.
8.
Angell, J.R.Report of the President. Bulletin of Yale University, Series 23, No. 10, February 1, 1927, p. 45.
9.
Bachman, Frank W.Final Report of the New York Committee on School Inquiry, 1911-13. Vol. I, Part II, pp. 606-09.
10.
Baltimore, Bureau of Educational Research.Increasing the Size of Classes Bulletin of Education No. 1, pp. 8-10. Baltimore: Board of Education.
11.
Boston, School Committee.Number of Pupils to a Teacher. Rules of the School Committee and Regulations of the Public Schools School Document No. 11, 1910, pp. 72-77. Boston : Printing Department.
12.
Buckingham, B.R.Effect of Size of Class on the Efficiency of TeachingProceedings, Second Annual Conference on Educational Research and Guidance. San Jose Teachers College Bulletin, April 1923, pp. 113-24.
13.
.... Class Size Again. Educational Research Bulletin 2: 2-11, September 19, 1923. Columbus: Ohio State University, College of Education, Bureau of Educational Research.
14.
.... A Study of Class Size (editorial). Educational Research Bulletin 3: 12-13, January 9, 1924. Columbus: Ohio State University, College of Education, Bureau of Educational Research.
15.
Buckingham, B.R.Class Size Once More (editorial) Educational Research Bulletin 4: 186f, April 29, 1925. Columbus: Ohio State University, College of Education, Bureau of Educational Research.
16.
Cleveland, Educational Commission. Number of Students in a High School Class or Section for Recitation. Report, 1906, pp. 16f.
17.
Elliott, E.C.Variations in the Achievements of PupilsNew York: Columbia University, Teachers College Contributions to Education , No. 72, 1914.
18.
Haertter, L.D.Experimental Development of Successful Teaching Techniques in Large High School Geometry ClassesMinneapolis: University of Minnesota High School. (Unpublished. A brief review will appear in the Bulletin referred to under entry No. 36 below.)
19.
Harlan, C.L.Relation of Size of Classes to Schoolroom EfficiencyIllinois State Teachers' Association, Proceedings, 1913 , pp. 156-61.
20.
Henry, Nelson B.Report of the Secretary of the Committee on Finance to the Chicago Board of Education, 1924. (Typewritten.)
21.
Hudelson, Earl.Relation of Class Size to Teaching Efficiency Educational Research Bulletin No. 4, pp. 20-26. Pasadena: Bureau of Research and Service, City Schools November-December, 1925.
22.
.... Report of the Subcommittee on the Relation of Class Size to Efficiency of Instruction In The President's Report for the Year 1925-26. Minneapolis: Bulletin of the University of Minnesota, Vol. 29, No. 53, March, 1927.
23.
.... Class Size in High Schools Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, March, 1927, pp. 33-47.
24.
McGuire, Margaret.Experimental Adaptations of Teaching Procedures to Large Geometry ClassesMinneapolis: University of Minnesota High School.1927. (Unpublished. To be reviewed briefly in the Bulletin referred to under entry No. 36 below.)
25.
Metzner, Alice B., and Berry, Charles Scott.Size of Classes for Mentally Retarded Children Training School Bulletin, October, 1926, pp. 241-51.
26.
National Education Association.Facts on the Cost of Public Education and What They Mean Bulletin 1, 1922 , Washington, D. C.: National Education Association, Research Department.
27.
New York, Report of the City Superintendent of Schools, July 13, 1913, pp. 41-44.
28.
New York Teachers of Modern Language, Report of Committee.A Study of the Modern Language Situation and Recommendations Pertinent Thereto. Bulletin of High Points, New YorkCity Schools, June, 1921.
29.
Smith, Dora V.Experimental Development of Successful Large-Class Teaching Techniques in High School EnglishMinneapolis: University of Minnesota High School.1928. (Unpublished. To be reviewed briefly in Bulletin referred to under entry No. 36 below. )
30.
St. Louis, Board of Education.Average Membership to Each Teacher Sixty-first Annual Report for the Year Ending June 30, 1915, pp. 360-63.
31.
Stevenson, P.R.Relation of Size of Class to School Efficiency Educational Research Bulletin, No. 10. Urbana: University of Illinois Bulletin, Vol. 19, No. 45, July 3, 1922.
32.
.... Smaller Classes or Larger: A Study of the Relation of Class Size to the Efficiency of Teaching Journal of Educational Research Monographs, No. 4, 1923. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Pub. Co.
33.
Class Size (editorial). Educational Research Bulletin 3: 140-43, April 2, 1924. Columbus: Ohio State University, College of Education, Bureau of Educational Research.
34.
.... More Evidence Concerning Large and Small Classes. Educational Research Bulletin , Vol. 4, No. 11, May 27, 1925, pp. 231-33. Columbus: Ohio State University, College of Education, Bureau of Educational Research.
35.
.... Class Size in the Elementary School. Ohio State University Studies, Vol. II, No. 10, November 30, 1925. Bureau of Educational Research Monographs, No. 3. Columbus: Ohio State University, College of Education, Bureau of Educational Research.
36.
Stuart, M.H., Hudelson, E., Breed, F.S., and others. Class Size in High Schools: A Symposium. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals. (In preparation. Address Secretary H. V. Church, Principal of the J. Sterling Morton H. S, Cicero, Ill.)
37.
Trueblood, C.E.My Geometry Class of One Hundred (Unpublished. To be reviewed in Bulletin referred to under entry No. 36, immediately above.)
38.
United States Bureau of Education.Size of Classes: A Study of the Colleges and High Schools in the North Central Association United States Bureau of Education Bulletin, 1915, No. 6, pp. 47-53. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office.
39.
United States Bureau of Education.Statistics of City School Systems, 1917-18. United States Bureau of Education Bulletin, 1920, No. 24, Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office.
40.
Wilson, Thomas J.Relation of the Size of Classes to Teaching EfficiencyNational League of Teachers Association Bulletin, Ap. 1927, pp. 20ff.
41.
Almack, John C.Class Size and EfficiencyJournal of the National Education Association, 12: 107-09. March, 1923.
42.
Averill, L.A., and Mueller, A.D.Size of Class and Reading EfficiencyElementary School Journal , 25: 682-91. May, 1925.
43.
Boyer, Philip A.Class Size and School ProgressPsychological Clinic, 8: 82-90. May 15, 1914.
44.
Breed, F.S., and McCarthy, Grace D.Size of Class and Efficiency of TeachingSchool and Society, 4: 965-71. December 23, 1916.
45.
Cornman, Oliver P.Size of Classes and School ProgressPsychological Clinic, 3: 206-12. December 15, 1909.
46.
Davis, C.O.The Size of Classes and the Teaching Load in the High Schools Accredited by the North Central AssociationSchool Review, 31: 412-29. June, 1923.
47.
Edmonson, J.B., and Mulder, F.J.Size of Class as a Factor in University InstructionJournal of Educational Research, 9: 1-12. January, 1924.
48.
Felter, William L., The Size of Classes. Educational Review, 41: 418-20. April, 1911.
49.
Harlan, C.L.Size of Class as a Factor in Schoolroom EfficiencyEducational Administration and Supervision, 1: 195-214. March, 1915. (See also references 59 and 50 below.)
50.
.... A Rejoinder to Smith's Criticism of "Size of Class as a Factor in Schoolroom Efficiency."Educational Administration and Supervision, 1: 465-69. September 1915. (See references No. 49 above and No. 59 below).
51.
.... Size of Class and Types of InstructionJournal of Educational Research, 14: 120-25. September, 1926.
52.
Hudelson, Earl.Class Size in UniversitiesEducational Review, 72: 231-34. November, 1926.
53.
.... Class Size and Student AchievementJournal of Engineering Education, April 1927, pp. 820-23. (Followed by discussions by John V. Martenis, Franklin W. Springer, and T. A. H. Teeter. )
54.
Merrill, Alice L.Classroom EnrollmentSierra Educational News, 14: 342f. June, 1918.
55.
Mueller, A.D.Size of Class as a Factor in Normal-School InstructionEducation , 45: 203-07. December, 1924.
56.
Rice, J.M.Educational Research: A Test in ArithmeticThe Forum, 34: 281-97. October, 1902.
57.
.... Educational Research: The Results of a Test in LanguageThe Forum, 35: 269-93. October, 1903.
Smith, Eugene R.Size of Class as a Factor in Schoolroom Efficiency— A Reply (to Harlan)Educational Administration and Supervision, 1: 384-89. June, 1915. (See also references No. 49 and 50 above.)
60.
Tope, R.E.,Groom, Emma, and Beeson, Marvin F.Size of Class and School EfficiencyJournal of Educational Research, 9: 126-32. February, 1924.