The author identifies 10 phases of the principal development pipeline, some of which are seldom acknowledged and many of which are inadequately addressed. The author argues that various stakeholder groups should collaborate to provide continuous professional development to future and current principals through each phase of the pipeline. Examples of leadership development and stakeholder collaboration for each phase of the pipeline are also provided in this article.
AdamsJ. E.CoplandM. A. (2007). Principal licensing and leadership for learning: The need for coherent policy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(2), 153-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601168719
3.
ArmstrongD. E. (2009). Administrative passages: Navigating the transition from teacher to assistant principal. Springer.
BaboG.VillaverdeC. (2013). Principal evaluation using a comprehensive portfolio development approach to facilitate professional growth and renewal. International Studies in Educational Administration, 41(2), 93-192.
6.
BarnettB. G.ShohoA. R.OleszewskiA. H. (2012). The job realities of beginning and experienced assistant principals. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(1), 92-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2011.611924
7.
BerlinerD. (2004). Describing the behavior and documenting the accomplishments of expert teachers. Bulletin of Science, Technology, & Society, 24(3), 200-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604265535
DanaN. F.TricaricoK.QuinnD. M. (2009). The administrator as action researcher: A case study of five principals and their engagement in systematic, intentional study of their own practice. Journal of School Leadership, 19(3), 232-265. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460901900301
DavisS. H.Darling-HammondL. (2012). Innovative principal preparation programs: What works and how we know. Planning and Changing, 43(1-2), 25-45. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ977545.pdf
13.
DiehlJ. N.GordonS. P. (2016). School administrators’ use of collaborative autobiography as a vehicle for reflection on accountability pressures. Reflective Practice, 17(4), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1178632
GordonS. P.DiehlJ. N. (2018, November). Initial assessment for principal licensure: Traditional, transitional, or transformative?Paper presented at the annual convention of the University Council of Educational Administration, Houston, TX.
19.
GordonS. P.JacobsJ.CroteauS. M.SolisR. (2018, October). Informal teacher leaders: Who they are, what they do, and how they impact teaching and learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council of Professors of Instructional Supervision, Orono, ME.
20.
GordonS. P.OliverJ.SolisR. (2016). Successful innovations in educational leadership preparation. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(2), 51-70. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1123995.pdf
21.
GordonS. P.RonderA. (2016). Perceptions of culturally responsive leadership inside and outside of a principal preparation program. International Journal of Educational Reform25(2), 125-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791602500202
GordonS. P.Taylor-BackorK.CroteauS. (2017). Recommended capacities for educational leadership: Pre-reform era scholars versus reform-era scholars versus national standards. NASSP Bulletin, 101(3), 188-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636517726856
24.
GrissomJ. A.MitaniH.BlissettR. S. L. (2017). Principal licensure exams and future job performance: Evidence from the school leaders licensure assessment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 248-280. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716680293
25.
GurleyK.Anast-MayL.LeeH. T. (2015). Developing instructional leaders through assistant principals’ academy: A partnership for success. Education and Urban Society, 47(2), 207-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513495272
HallingerH.MurphyJ. F. (2012). Running on empty? Finding the time and capacity to lead learning. NASSP Bulletin, 97(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636512469288
28.
HoganT.RabinowitzM. (2009). Teacher expertise and the development of a problem representation. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802613301
JacobsJ.GordonS. P.SolisR. (2016). Critical issues in teacher leadership: A national look at teachers’ perceptions. Journal of School Leadership, 26, 374-406. https://doi.org10.1177/105268461602600301
LapadatJ. C. (2009). Writing our way into shared understanding: Collaborative autobiographical writing in the qualitative methods class. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(6), 955-979. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800409334185
33.
LeeV.MaddenM. (2019). “We’re in this together”: Principals and teachers as partners and learners in lesson study. NASSP Bulletin, 103(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636519826717
MillerR. J.GoddardR. D.KimM.JacobR.GoddardY.SchroederP. (2016). Can professional development improve school leadership? Results from a randomized control trial assessing the impact of McREL’s balanced leadership program on principals in rural Michigan schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(4), 531-566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16651926
36.
MuthR.Browne-FerrignoT.BellamyT.FulmerC.SilverM. (2013). Using teacher instructional leadership as a predictor of principalship. Journal of School Leadership, 23(1), 122-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461302300105
37.
NorthfieldS. (2014). Multi-dimensional trust: How beginning principals build trust with their staff during leader succession. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(4), 410-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2013.825011
38.
OleszewskiA.ShohoA.BarnettB. (2012). The development of assistant principals: A literature review. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 264-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211223301
39.
OliverJ.GordonS. P.OliverM. L. (2018). Examining the value aspiring principals place on various instructional strategies in principal preparation. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 13(3), 1-18. http://journals.sfu.ca/ijepl/index.php/ijepl/article/view/735
40.
OplatkaI.LapidotA. (2018). Novice principals’ perceptions of their mentoring process in early career stage: The key role of mentor-protégé relations. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 50(3), 204-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2017.1420044
41.
PetridesL.JimesC. (2014). Assistant principal leadership development: A narrative capture study. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2012-0017
SimonS.DoleS.FarragherY. (2019). Custom-designed and safe-space coaching: Australian beginning principals supported by experienced peers form pipeline of confident future leaders. School Leadership & Management, 39(2), 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1470502
SperoK. (2016). Engaging principals in professional development. Principal Leadership, 16(7), 42-45.
47.
SunA.ShohoA. R. (2017). Assistant principals’ perceptions of value added to school success. Journal of School Leadership, 27(4), 456-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461702700401
TurnbullB. (2005). Facilitating early career leadership through pre-service training. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(5), 457-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13450600500238451
WrightL.da CostaJ. (2016). Rethinking professional development for school leaders: Possibilities and tensions. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 25(1), 29-47.
54.
ZepedaS. J.ParyloO.BengtsoE. (2014). Analyzing principal professional development practices through the lens of adult learning theory. Professional Development in Education, 40(2), 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.821667