Understanding Author Academic Disciplinary Background to Direct a More Effective Use of Standardized Testing Within the School Community

Abstract

Standardized testing is an external control mechanism for K-12 public schools. Principals, nested between internal and external influences, must manage the tension created by testing’s roles as both an internal improvement tool and as an external control mechanism. Five competing narratives, each shaped by author academic background, significantly influence this tension. The testing literature is complex, but understanding these five main narratives can enable a principal to more effectively and proactively lead the testing narrative within their own school community.

Keywords

educational leadership standardized testing academic background

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Airasian

(1987). State mandated testing and educational reform: Context and consequences. American Journal of Education, 95, 393-412.

Behrent

(2009). Reclaiming our freedom to teach: Education reform in the Obama era. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 240-247.

Bell

(1993). Reflections one decade after “A nation at risk.” Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 592-597.

Berliner

D. C.

Biddle

B. J.

(1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Betebenner

D. W.

Wenning

R. J.

Briggs

D. C.

(2011). Student growth percentiles and shoe leather. Retrieved from http://nciea.org/publications/BakerResponse_DB11.pdf

Bower

(2013). Telling time with a broken clock: The trouble with standardized testing. Education Canada, 53(3), 24-27.

Bracey

G. W.

(1995). The fifth Bracey report on the condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 149-160.

Bracey

G. W.

(2003). On the death of childhood and the destruction of public schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Buffum

Mattos

Weber

(2012). Simplifying response to intervention: Four essential guiding principles. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

10.

Carnoy

Rothstein

(2013). What do international tests really show about U.S. student performance? Retrieved from http://www.epi.org/publication/us-student-performance-testing/

11.

Casbarro

(2005, February). The politics of high-stakes testing. Education Digest, 20-23.

12.

Chapman

P. D.

(1988). Schools as sorters: Lewis M. Terman, applied psychology, and the intelligence testing movement, 1890-1930. New York: New York University Press.

13.

Chappuis

Stiggins

(2009). The quest for quality. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 14-19.

14.

Chauncey

Dobbin

(1963). Testing: Its place in education today. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

15.

Chiang

(2009). How accountability pressure on failing schools affects student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 1045-1057.

16.

Cizek

G. J.

(2001). More untintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(4), 19-27.

17.

Cizek

G. J.

(2005). High stakes testing: Contexts, characteristics, critiques, and consequences. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardized testing (pp. 341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

18.

Cooper

B. S.

Fusarelli

L. D.

Randall

E. V.

(2004). Better policies, better schools: Theories and applications. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

19.

Dorn

(1998). The political legacy of school accountability systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 6(1), 1. doi:10.14507/epaa.v6n1.1998

20.

DuFour

(2015). In praise of American educators: And how they can become even better. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

21.

Feuer

M. J.

(2011). Politics, economics, and testing-some reflections. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 24(1), 25-29.

22.

Friedman

T. L.

Mandelbaum

(2011). That used to be us: How America fell behind in the world it invented and how we can come back. New York, NY: Farrar, Struas, & Gireaux.

23.

Fullan

(2011). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform (Paper 204 in Center for Strategic Education Seminar Series: Center for Strategic Education). Retrieved from http://theeta.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/eta-articles-110711.pdf

24.

Galton

(1879). Psychometric experiments. Brain, 2, 149-162.

25.

Gandal

McGiffert

(2003). The power of testing. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 39-42.

26.

Garrison

M. J.

(2009). A measure of failure: The political origins of standardized testing. Albany: State University of New York Press.

27.

Goldhaber

Brewer

D. J.

(1997). Why don’t schools and teachers seem to matter: Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 505-523.

28.

Hanushek

E. A.

Raymond

M. E.

(2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 297-327.

29.

Harris

Longstreet

W. S.

(1990). Alternative testing and the national agenda for control. Social Studies, 81, 148-152.

30.

Harris

Smith

B. M.

Harris

(2011). The myths of standardized tests: Why they don’t tell you what you think they do. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.

31.

Harvey

Marx

Fowler

McKay

(2015). School performance in context: Indicators of school inputs and outputs in nine similar nation. Retrieved from http://www.superintendentsforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/School-Performance-in-Context.pdf

32.

Herman

Linn

R. L.

(2014). New assessments, new rigor. Educational Leadership, 71(6), 34-37.

33.

Hess

F. M.

Mehta

(2013). Data: No deus ex machina. Educational Leadership, 70(5), 71-75.

34.

Hill

C. W. L.

Jones

G. R.

(2013). Strategic management theory (10th ed.). Stamford, CT: South-Western Cengage Learning.

35.

Honig

M. I.

Hatch

T. C.

(2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16-30.

36.

Jacob

(2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago public schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 761-796.

37.

Kohn

(2000). The case against standardized testing: Raising test scores, ruining the schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

38.

Koretz

(2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

39.

Layton

(2015, December 10). Obama signs new K-12 education law that ends No Child Left Behind. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/obama-signs-new-k-12-education-law-that-ends-no-child-left-behind/2015/12/10/c9e58d7c-9f51-11e5-a3c5-c77f2cc5a43c_story.html?utm_term=.0f8888d228bf

40.

Leithwood

Seashore-Louis

(2012). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

41.

Lemann

(1995). The structure of success in America. Atlantic Monthly, 276(2), 41-60.

42.

Lemann

(2000). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.

43.

Levin

H. M.

(2001). High-stakes testing and economic productivity. In G. Orfield Kornhaber

M. L.

(Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 39-49). New York, NY: Century Foundation.

44.

Madaus

(1985). Test scores as administrative mechanisms in educational policy. Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 611-617.

45.

Madaus

Russell

Higgins

(2009). The paradoxes of high stakes testing: How they affect students, their parents, teachers, principals, schools, and society. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

46.

McDonnell

L. M.

(1994). Policymakers’ views of student assessment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

47.

Mehrens

W. A.

(1998). Consequences of assessment: What is the evidence? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 6(13), 1-30.

48.

Mitchell

D. E.

Crowson

R. L.

Shipps

(2011). What have we learned about shaping educational policy? In Mitchell

D. E.

Crowson

R. L.

Shipps

(Eds.), Shaping education policy: Power and process (pp. 286-296). New York, NY: Routledge.

49.

Monroe

(1987). Testing: A political scalpel. English Journal, 76(8), 24.

50.

Office of Technology Assessment, United States Congress. (1992). Testing in American schools: Asking the right questions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

51.

Parkinson

(2009). Political economy and the NCLB regime. Educational Forum, 73, 44-57.

52.

Pfeffer

Salancik

G. R.

(2003). The external control of organizations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

53.

Phelps

R. P.

(2003). Kill the messenger: The war on standardized testing. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

54.

QSR International Pty Ltd. (2014): NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 10) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.qsrinternational.com/what-is-nvivo

55.

Ravitch

(2010). The death and life of the great American school system. New York, NY: Basic Books.

56.

Ravitch

(2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

57.

Reese

W. J.

(2013). Testing wars in the public schools: A forgotten history. Cumberland, RI: Harvard University Press.

58.

Resnick

D. P.

(1981). Testing in America: A supportive environment. Phi Delta Kappan, 62, 625-628.

59.

Resnick

D. P.

Resnick

L. B.

(1985). Standards, curriculum, and performance: A historical and comparative perspective. Educational Researcher, 14(4), 5-20.

60.

Rothman

(1995). Measuring up: Standards, assessment, and school reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

61.

Salganik

L. H.

(1985). Why testing reforms are so popular and how they are changing education. Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 607-610.

62.

Saxe

J. G.

(1873). The poems of John Godfrey Saxe, complete edition. Boston, MA: James R. Osgood.

63.

Seashore Louis

Robinson

V. M

. (2012). External mandates and instructional leadership: School leaders as mediating agents. Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 629-665.

64.

Senge

(1990). The fifth discipline: The art and science of the learning organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.

65.

Shaked

Schechter

(2014). Systems school leadership: Exploring an emerging construct. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 792-811.

66.

Snyder

L. L.

(2015). 2016-2018 strategic plan: Lakeville area public schools. Lakeville, MN, Lakeville Area Public Schools. Retrieved from http://isd194.org/about/strategic-plan/

67.

Spellings

(2010). Measuring the value of accountability. U.S. News & World Report, 147, 33-34.

68.

Temin

(2014). Low pay, low quality. Proquest, 3(3), 1-8.

69.

Thorndike

E. L.

(1918). The nature, purposes and general methods of measurements of educational products. In The seventeenth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Vol. 17, pp. 16-24). Bloomington, IL: Public School.

70.

Turgut

(2013). International tests and the U.S. educational reforms: Can success be replicated? Clearing House, 86(2), 64-73. doi:10.1080/00098655.2012.748640

71.

Warren

J. R.

Grodsky

(2009). Exit exams harm students who fail them-and don’t benefit students who pass them. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 645-649.

72.

Wiliam

(2010). Standardized testing and school accountability. Educational Psychologist, 45, 107-122. doi:10.1080/00461521003703060