Cattell, McKean. "Examination Grades and Credits," Popular Science Monthly, LXVI, 367-79.
2.
Foster, William T. "Counting Quality as Well as Quantity for College Degrees," Administration of the College Curriculum , pp. 233-50. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
3.
Hoblitt, Merritt L. "The High-School Unit, Quantity, Quality, and Credit," School Review," XXIII, 303-6.
4.
Hyde, William DeWitt. "The Adjustment of the Small College to Our Educational System," Outlook, LXXI, 886-89.
5.
Judd, Charles H. "Formalism in Defining High-School Units," School Review, XXII, 649-65.
6.
Judd, Charles H. "The Qualitative Definition of High-School Units," School and Society, III, 149-58.
7.
Kelley, E.J. " Concerning the Evils of Credit for Quality as Enumerated by Professor Ladd," Educational Review, XXXVII, 516-19.
8.
Kellicott, William E. "The Examination of Certain Objections to the Missouri System of Grading ," School and Society, II, 81-88.
9.
Ladd, A.J. "Credit for Quality in Secondary and Higher Education," Educational Review, XXXVII, 298-305.
10.
Meyers, Max. "Is Credit for Quality Sound—A Criticism ," School Review, XXIII, 708-10.
11.
Ruediger, W.C. "Credit for Quality," School and Society, III, 207-8.
12.
—. "Is Credit for Quality Sound?" School Review, XXIII, 450-54.
13.
Secor, W.B. "Credit for Quality in Secondary Education ," Educational Review, XXXV, 486-90.
14.
Squires, Vernon P. "Concerning the Evils of Credit for Quality ," Educational Review, XXXVIII, 90-92.
15.
Johnson, Franklin W. "Credit for Courses in the University High School," School Review, XXIII, 715-18.
16.
Kennedy, Joseph. "Credit for Quality in the University of North Dakota," Educational Review, XXXII, 525.
17.
Meyers, Max. "Experience with the Missouri Grading System ," Science, N.S., XXXIII, 661-67.
18.
Mitchell, H.B. "Honor Courses in Colleges," Educational Review, XL, 217-28.
19.
Varrelman, F.A. "Grades for Merit," School and Society, II, 605.
20.
Albright, G.H. "How Teachers Mark," School and Society, III, 426-27.
21.
Benedict, H.Y. "Grades and Their Standardization at the Univeristy of Texas," School and Society, III, 105-7.
22.
Brown, Robert C. "Uniformity of Grading in Colleges and Universities ," School and Society, I, 32-35.
23.
Cajorie, F. "New Marking System and Means of Measuring Mathematical Abilities," Science, N.S., XXXIX, 874-81.
24.
Canning, J.B. "The Meaning of Students' Marks," School Review, XXIV, 196-202.
25.
Foster, William T. "The Need of a Scientific Distribution of College Credits," Popular Science Monthly, LXXVIII, 388-408; also in Administration of College Curriculum, pp. 250-303. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
26.
Hall, W.S. "A Guide to the Equitable Grading of Students," School Science and Mathemdtics, VI, 501-18.
27.
Kelley, J.F. "Teachers' Marks," Contributions to Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
28.
Ruediger, W.C. , Henning, Ges. H., and Wilbur , William A. " Standardization of Courses and Grades," School and Society, I, 642-43.
29.
Rugg, H.W. "Teachers' Marks and Marking Systems," Educational Administration and Supervision, February, 1915.
30.
Sechrist, Frank K. "The Process of Examining," Educational Review, L, 399-417.
31.
Starch, Daniel , and Elliott, Edward C. "Reliability of the Grading of High-School Work in English, History, and Mathematics," School Review , XX, 442-58; XXI, 254-60, 676-82.