As instructional leadership involves attempts to understand and improve complex systems, this study explored principals’ perceptions regarding possible contributions of systems thinking to instructional leadership. Based on a qualitative analysis, systems thinking was perceived by middle and high school principals to contribute to the following three areas of instructional leadership: (1) improvement of school curriculum, (2) development of professional learning communities, and (3) interpretation of performance data. Systems thinking as a potential enabler of instructional leadership is discussed and implications are suggested.
AndersonG. L.HerrK. (2011). Scaling up “evidence-based” practices for teachers is a profitable but discredited paradigm. Educational Researcher, 40(6), 287-289.
2.
AndrewT. N.PetkovD. (2003). The need for a systems thinking approach to the planning of rural telecommunications infrastructure. Telecommunications Policy, 27(1-2), 75-93.
3.
AprilD.BouchammaY. (2015). Teacher supervision practices and principals’ characteristics. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 61, 329-346.
4.
ArnoldR. D.WadeJ. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669-678.
5.
ÅströmK. J.MurrayR. M. (2008). Feedback systems: An introduction for scientists and engineers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BenDavid-HadarI. (2016). School finance policy and social justice. International Journal of Educational Development, 46, 166-174.
7.
BlizzardJ.KlotzL.PradhanA.DukesM. (2012). Introducing whole-systems design to first-year engineering students with case studies. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13, 177-196.
8.
BrazerS. D.BauerS. C. (2013). Preparing instructional leaders: A model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 645-684.
9.
BrownJ. (2012). Systems thinking strategy: The new way to understand your business and drive performance. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.
10.
CabreraD.CabreraL. (2015). Systems thinking made simple: New hope for solving wicked problems. Ithaca, NY: Odyssean.
11.
Capstones. (2008). Perception of the principal’s role in the state of Israel: Report by the professional committee to formulate policy recommendations for the Ministry of Education. Jerusalem, Israel: Avney Rosha.
12.
ChanceP. L. (2005). Engaging communities through vision development: A systems approach to public relations. Journal of School Public Relations, 26, 139-155.
13.
ChecklandP. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice; Soft systems methodology: A 30 year retrospective. Chichester, England: John Wiley.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson.
15.
DalyA. J.FinniganK. S. (Eds.). (2016). Thinking and acting systemically: Improving school districts under pressure. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
16.
DavidzH. L.NightingaleD. J. (2008). Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers. Systems Engineering, 11(1), 1-14.
17.
DeBevoiseW. (1984). Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 14-20.
18.
DemskiD.RacherbäumerK. (2015). Principals’ evidence-based practice: Findings from German schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 29, 735-748.
19.
DiPaolaM. F.HoyW. K. (2008). Principals improving instruction: Supervision, evaluation, and professional development. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
20.
DufourR.DufourR.EakerR.ManyT. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
21.
DwyerD. C. (1984). The search for instructional leadership: Routines and subtleties in the principal’s role. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 32-37.
22.
DyehouseM.BennettD.HarborJ.ChildressA.DarkM. (2009). A comparison of linear and systems thinking approaches for program evaluation, illustrated using the Indiana interdisciplinary GK-12. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 187-196.
23.
EdigerM. (2014). The changing role of the school principal. College Student Journal, 48, 265-267.
24.
ElmJ. P.GoldensonD. R. (2012). The business case for systems engineering study: Results of the systems engineering effectiveness survey. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
25.
EtheringtonK. (2004). Becoming reflexive researchers: Using ourselves in research. London, England: Jessica Kingley.
26.
FlickU. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
FordA. (2009). Modeling the environment (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.
28.
FrankM. (2012). Engineering systems thinking: Cognitive competencies of successful systems engineers. Procedia Computer Science, 8, 273-278.
29.
FullanM. (2004). System thinkers in action: Moving beyond the standards plateau. Nottingham, England: Department of Education and Skills.
30.
FullanM. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
31.
FullanM. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
GharajedaghiJ. (2011). Systems thinking, managing chaos and complexity: A platform for designing business architecture (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
33.
GibbsG. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London, England: Sage.
34.
GlatthornA. A.JailallJ. M. (2009). The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
GraczewskiC.KnudsonC. J.HoltzmanD. J. (2009). Instructional leadership in practice: What does it look like, and what influence does it have?Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 14(1), 72-96.
36.
HallingerP. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 271-306.
37.
HallingerP.MurphyJ. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86, 217-247.
38.
HallingerP.WangW. C. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
39.
HieronymiA. (2013). Understanding systems science: A visual and integrative approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30, 580-595.
40.
HobanD. F. (2002). Teacher learning for education change: A systems thinking approach. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
41.
HolmesB. J.FinegoodD. T.RileyB. L.BestA. (2012). Systems thinking in dissemination and implementation research. In R. C. BrownsonColditzG. A.ProctorE. K. (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (pp. 175-191). New York, NY: Oxford.
42.
HordS. (2009). Professional learning communities. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 40-43.
43.
HungW. (2008). Enhancing systems thinking skills with modelling. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 1099-1120.
44.
InbarD. E. (2009). Developing autonomy: The case of the Israeli school system. In A. Nir (Ed.), Centralization and school empowerment: From rhetoric to practice (pp. 59-78). New York, NY: Nova Science.
45.
Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Statistical abstract of Israel, December 2013 (No. 64). Jerusalem, Israel: Author.
46.
JacksonM. C. (2009). Fifty years of systems thinking for management. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, S24-S32.
47.
JenkinsJ.PfeiferR. S. (2012). The principal as curriculum leader. Principal Leadership, 12(5), 30-34.
48.
JollyR. (2015). Systems thinking for business: Capitalize on structures hidden in plain sight. Portland, OR: Systems Solutions.
49.
KeatonS. A.BodieG. D. (2011). Explaining social constructivism. Communication Teacher, 25(4), 192-196.
50.
KenslerL. A. W.ReamesE.MurrayJ.PatrickL. (2011). Systems thinking tools for improving evidence-based practice: A cross-case analysis of two high school leadership teams. High School Journal, 95(2), 32-53.
51.
LeischowS. J.BestA.TrochimW. M.ClarkP. I.GallagherR. S.MarcusS. E.MatthewsE. (2008). Systems thinking to improve the public’s health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2 Suppl.), S196-S203.
52.
LeithwoodK.HarrisA.StraussT. (2010). Leading school turnaround: How successful leaders transform low-performing schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53.
LevinT.LevinI. (2013). Evaluating the pedagogical potential of hybrid models. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 32, 303-320.
54.
LiebermanA.Pointer MaceD. (2008). Teacher learning: The key to educational reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 226-234.
55.
MarloweB. A.PageM. L. (2005). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
56.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
MazzocchiF. (2008). Complexity in biology: Exceeding the limits of reductionism and determinism using complexity theory. EMBO Reports, 9, 10-14.
58.
McIntoshK.KelmJ. L.Canizal DelabraA. (2016). In search of how principals change: A qualitative study of events that help and hinder administrator support for school-wide PBIS. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(2), 100-110.
59.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
MilesM. B.HubermanM. A.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
MitchellC.CastleJ. B. (2005). The instructional role of elementary school principals. Canadian Journal of Education, 28, 409-433.
62.
NeumerskiC. M. (2012). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 310-347.
63.
NirA. E.Ben-DavidA.BoglerR.InbarD.ZoharA. (2016). School autonomy and 21st century skills in the Israeli educational system: Discrepancies between the declarative and operational levels. International Journal of Educational Management, 30, 1231-1246.
64.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Society at glance 2011—OECD social indicators. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/els/social/indicators/SAG
OrtlippM. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. Qualitative Report, 13, 695-705.
67.
Osborne-LampkinL.Cohen-VogelL. (2014). “Spreading the wealth”: How principals use performance data to populate classrooms. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13, 188-208.
68.
PangN. S.PisapiaJ. (2012a). The strategic thinking skills of Hong Kong school leaders: Usage and effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40, 343-361.
69.
PangN. S.PisapiaJ. (2012b, January). Strategic leadership for school change. Paper presented at the 25th International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Malmö, Sweden.
70.
PisapiaJ.Reyes-GuerraD. (2007). The strategic thinking questionnaire (STQ). Defray Beach, FL: Strategic Leadership International.
71.
PowellK. C.KalinaC. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130, 241-250.
72.
PrintyS. (2010). Principals’ influence on instructional quality: Insights from US schools. School Leadership and Management, 30, 111-126.
73.
PryorF. L. (2008). System as a causal force. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67, 545-559.
74.
RangeB. G.ScherzS.HoltC. R.YoungS. (2011). Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23, 243-265.
75.
RichmondB. (1994). System dynamics/systems thinking: Let’s just get on with it. System Dynamics Review, 10(2-3), 135-157.
76.
RigbyJ. G. (2014). Three logics of instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 610-644.
77.
RobinsonV.LloydC.RoweK. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 564-588.
78.
RosenbergA. (2006). Darwinian reductionism: How to stop worrying and love molecular biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79.
RossmanG. B.RallisS. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
SaloP.NylundJ.StjernstrømE. (2015). On the practice architectures of instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43, 490-506.
81.
Schwartz-SheaP. (2006). Judging quality: Evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In D. YanowSchwartz-SheaP. (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 89-113). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
82.
Seashore LouisK.LeithwoodK.WahlstromK. L.AndersonS. E. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. Minneapolis–Saint Paul: University of Minnesota.
83.
SengeP. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Currency, Doubleday.
84.
SengeP. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Currency, Doubleday.
85.
SengeP. M.Cambron-McCabeN.LucasT.SmithB.DuttonJ.KleinerA. (2012). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents and everyone who cares about education. New York, NY: Crown.
86.
ShakedH.SchechterC. (2014). Systems school leadership: Exploring an emerging construct. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 792-811.
87.
ShakedH.SchechterC. (forthcoming). Holistic school leadership: Systems thinking for educational leaders. New York, NY: Springer.
88.
TaberT. D. (2007). Using metaphors to teach organization theory. Journal of Management Education, 31, 541-554.
89.
TanC. Y. (2012). Instructional leadership: Toward a contextualized knowledge creation model. School Leadership & Management, 32, 183-194.
90.
TaylorS. L.BogdanR.DeVaultM. L. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
91.
TejedaJ.FerreiraS. (2014). Applying systems thinking to analyze wind energy sustainability. Procedia Computer Science, 28, 213-220.
92.
ThurstonE. K. (2000). Enabling systems thinking in the “mesonic millennium”: The need for systemic methodologies for conceptual learning in undergraduate management education. Journal of Management Education, 24, 10-31.
Webster-WrightA. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Learning, 79, 702-739.
96.
WellsC.KeaneW. G. (2008). Building capacity for professional learning communities through a systems approach: A toolbox for superintendents. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 4(4), 24-32.
97.
WilsonB.Van HaperenK. (2015). Soft systems thinking, methodology and the management of change. London, England: Palgrave.
98.
WoodD. R. (2007a). Professional learning communities: Teachers, knowledge, and knowing. Theory Into Practice, 46, 281-290.
99.
WoodD. R. (2007b). Teachers’ learning communities: Catalyst for change or a new infrastructure for the status quo?Teachers College Record, 109, 699-739.
100.
YlimakiR. M. (2012). Curriculum leadership in a conservative era. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 304-346.
101.
ZepedaS. J.BengstonE.ParyloO. (2012). Examining the planning and management of principal succession. Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 136-158.
102.
ZmudaA.KuklisR.KlineE. (2004). Transforming schools: Creating a culture of continuous improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
103.
ZulaufC. A. (2007). Learning to think systemically: What does it take?Learning Organization, 14, 489-498.
