The purpose of this study was to determine how K-12 public school teachers perceive the use of student performance data in teacher evaluations. The proprietary, utility, feasibility, and accuracy standards created by the Joint Committee on Standards for Education Evaluation served as a framework for the study. An online survey was deployed to a random stratified sample of teachers across the United States. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used to determine the level of teacher agreement on statements.
BakerE. L.BartonP. E.Darling-HammondL.HaertelE.LaddH. F.LinnR. L.. . . ShepardL. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers (Briefing Paper No. 278). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
2.
BraunH. (2005). Using student progress to evaluate teachers: A primer on value-added models. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ. N.RockoffJ. E. (2011, December). The long-term impacts of teachers: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood (NBER Working Paper No. 17699). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w17699.pdf
4.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44. doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
DavisD. R.EllettC. D.AnnunziataJ. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16, 287-302.
8.
DillmanD. (2002). Presidential address: Navigating the rapids of change: Some observations on survey methodology in the early twenty-first century. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 473-494.
9.
EmeryK.OhanianS. (2004). Why is corporate America bashing our public schools?Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10.
GiganteN. A.FirestoneW. A. (2008). Administrative support and teacher leadership in schools implementing reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 302-331.
11.
GrayL.BittermanA.GoldringR. (2013). Characteristics of Public School Districts in the United States: Results from the 2011–12 Schools and Staffing Survey (NCES 2013–311). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013311.pdf
12.
GreeneJ. C.LeeJ. H. (2006). Quieting educational reform . . . with educational reform. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 337-352.
13.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses related to student achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
HeckR. H. (2009). Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: Investigating a multilevel cross-classified model. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, 227-249.
15.
HermanJ.WintersL.GolanS. (1989). CSE Technical Report 298: Reporting foreffective decision making. UCLA Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,and Student Testing. Retrieved from http://www.dse.usla.edu/products/reportsset.html.
16.
HopkinsP. T. (2013). Teacher perceptions of the use of student performance data in teacher evaluations (Doctoral dissertation).
17.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2009). Personnel evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
LessingA.de WittM. (2007). The value of continuous professional development: teachers’ perceptions. South African Journal of Education, 27, 53–67.
20.
National Research Council Board on Testing and Assessment. (2009). Letter report to the U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
PrinceC. D.SchuermannP. J.GuthrieJ. W.WithamP. J.MilanowskiA. T.ThornC. A. (2009). The other 69 percent: Fairly rewarding the performance of teachers of nontested subjects and grades. Washington, DC: Center for Educator Compensation Reform. Retrieved from http://www.cecr.ed.gov/guides/other69Percent.pdf.
22.
RothsteinJ. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 175-214.
23.
SandersW. L.RiversJ. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
24.
SpringerM.BallouD.HamiltonL.LeV.LockwoodV.McCaffreyD.PepperM.StecherB. (2010). Teacher pay for performance: Experimental evidence from the Project on Incentives in Teaching. Nashville, TN: National Center of Performance Incentives.
25.
StrongeJ. H. (Ed.). (2006). Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
26.
StrongeJ. H.TuckerP. D. (2003). Handbook on teacher evaluation: Assessing and improving performance. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
27.
StrongeJ. H.WardT. J.GrantL. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 339-355.
28.
StrongeJ. H.WardT. J.TuckerP. D.HindmanJ. L. (2008). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 165-184.
29.
TochT.RothmanR. (2008). Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education. Washington, DC: Education Sector.
30.
TuckerP. D.StrongeJ. H. (2005). Linking teacher evaluation and student learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
31.
TurnbullB. (2002). Teacher participation and buy-in: Implications for school reform initiatives. Learning Environments Research, 5, 235-252.
32.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Table 209.10: Number and percentage distribution of teachers in public and private elementary and secondary schools, by selected teacher characteristics: Selected years, 1987-88 through 2011-12. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_209.10.asp#
33.
WeisbergD.SextonS.MulhernJ.KeelingD. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Retrieved from http://widgeteffect.org/downloads/TheWidgetEffect.pdf
34.
WrightS. P.HornS. P.SandersW. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 57-67.
35.
YarbroughD. B.ShulhaL. M.HopsonR. K.CaruthersF. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
