This article provides a tabular analysis of court rulings where public school principals challenged the adverse employment actions of involuntary transfer, suspension, demotion, nonrenewal, constructive termination, and termination during the period 1998-2012. The primary findings were that (a) the judicial outcomes were markedly in favor of the defendant school districts and (b) although the number of claims had increased during this 15-year period, the outcomes trend did not correspondingly shift in favor of the plaintiff-principals.
Amite County School District v. Floyd, 935 So. 2d 1034 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005).
2.
Black v. Columbus Public Schools, 2005 WL 3440879 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 14, 2005).
3.
Blaize v. Klein, 804 N.Y.S.2d 813 (App. Div. 2005), further proceedings, 889 N.Y.S.2d 665 (App. Div. 2009).
4.
Blume v. Denville Township Board of Education, 756 A.2d 1019 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2000).
5.
Chadwell v. Lee County School Board, 535 F. Supp. 2d 586 (W.D. Va. 2008).
6.
Corbett v. Duerring, 2012 WL 1855193 (S.D. W. Va May 21, 2012).
7.
CoxB.ZirkelP. A. (2009). School board’s adverse employment actions against superintendents: An empirical analysis of the case law. West’s Education Law Reporter, 244, 1-19.
8.
DavisS. H. (1998). Superintendent’s perspectives on the involuntary departure of public school principals: The most frequent reasons why principals lose their jobs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 58-90.
9.
DavisonR. L.StropeJ. L.UerlingD. F. (2003). The personal lives and professional responsibilities of P-12 educators: Off-duty conduct as grounds for adverse employment actions. West’s Education Law Reporter, 171, 691-174.
10.
Eddings v. Board of Education, 712 N.E.2d 902 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999).
11.
Education Law Association. (2013). School Law Reporter, 55, 1-6.
12.
Everson v. Board of Education, 123 F. App’x 221 (6th Cir. 2005), on remand, 2006 WL 618889 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 10, 2006).
13.
Fisher v. Wellington Exempted Village School Board of Education, 223 F. Supp. 2d 833 (N.D. Ohio 2002).
Kabes v. School District, 387 F. Supp. 2d 955 (W.D. Wis. 2005).
24.
KallioB. R.GeiselR. T. (2011). To speak or not to speak: Applying Garcetti and whistleblower laws to public school employee speech. West’s Education Law Reporter, 264, 517-540.
LupiniW. H.ZirkelP. A. (2003). An outcomes analysis of education litigation. Educational Policy, 17, 257-279.
27.
McFerren v. Farrell Area School District, 993 A.2d 344 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010).
28.
Midlam v. Greenville City School District Board of Education, 831 N.E.2d 1056 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
29.
Murphy v. Saint Paul Public Schools, 795 N.W. 2d 30 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011).
30.
National Association of Secondary Principals. (2007). Changing role of the middle level and high school leader: Learning from the past—preparing for the future. Retrieved from http://www.nassp.org/portals/0/content/55304.pdf
Nuzzi v. Saint George Community Consolidated School District, 688 F. Supp. 2d 815 (C.D. Ill. 2010).
33.
PaigeM.ZirkelP. A. (2014). The termination boom based on performance evaluations: Age and disability discrimination. West’s Education Law Reporter, 300, 1-22.
34.
Patten v. Grant Joint Union High School District, 37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 113 (Ct. App. 2005).
RussoC. J. (Ed.). (1999-2012). Yearbooks of education law. Dayton, OH: Education Law Association.
37.
StefkovichJ. A.TorresM. S. (2003). The demographics of justice: Student searches, student rights, and administrator practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 259-289. doi:10.1177/0013161X03251155
38.
ZirkelP. A. (2002). Administrator demotions: An update. Principal, 81(4), 70-72.
39.
ZirkelP. A. (2003). Free speech for principals?Principal, 83(2), 10-13.
40.
ZirkelP. A. (2008). Principal demotions: An update. Principal, 87(4), 8-10.
41.
ZirkelP. A. (2013). High stakes testing: Administrator consequences. Principal, 92(5), 54-55.
42.
ZirkelP. A.GluckmanI. (1994). Investigatory and disciplinary suspensions of principals. Principal, 73(5), 48-49.
43.
ZirkelP. A.JohnsonB. L. (2011). The “explosion” in education litigation: An update. West’s Education Law Reporter, 265, 1-8.
44.
ZirkelP. A.LyonsC. A. (2011). Restraining the use of restraints for students with disabilities: An empirical analysis of the case law. Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal, 10, 323-354.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
