This multiple-site case study examined distributed leadership practices of three middle school principals, using observations, interviews, and document analysis. Findings disclosed that the principals built on the interdisciplinary teaming structure to develop empowering organizational structures that promoted democratic governance. Employing distributed practices, they identified teacher leaders to guide curriculum, professional development, and building management. While utilizing the teaming structure to facilitate building-wide decision making, the principals also found that distributing leadership across several individuals sometimes created challenges for communications accuracy.
AltM. N.ChoyS. P. (2001). In the middle: Characteristics of public schools with a focus on middle schools. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2(3), 36-41.
2.
BellL.BolamR.CubillomL. (2003). A systematic review of the impact of school headteachers and principals on student outcomes. London, England: EPPI-Center, Social Science Research Institute, University of London.
3.
BennettN.HarveyJ. A.WiseC.WoodsP. A. (2003). Distributed leadership: A desk study. London, England: National College for School Leadership.
4.
BogdanR. C.BilkenS. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
CollinsJ. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap . . . and others don’t. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
6.
ConleyS.FauskeJ.PounderD. G. (2004). Teacher work group effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 663-703. doi:10.1177/0013161X04268841
7.
CrowG. M.PounderD. G. (2000). Interdisciplinary teacher teams: Context, design, and process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 216-254. doi:10.1177/0013161X00362004
8.
ErbT. O. (Ed.). (2001). This we believe—and now we must act. Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
9.
FelnerR.JacksonA.KasakD.MulhallP.BrandS.FlowersN. (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle years: Longitudinal study of a network engaged in Turning Points-based comprehensive school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 528-550.
10.
GeorgeP.AlexanderW. M. (2003). The exemplary middle school. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11.
GronnP. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management Administration, 28, 317-338.
12.
GrubbW. N.FlessaJ. J. (2006). “A job too big for one”: Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 518-550. doi:10.1177/0013161X06290641
HarrisA. (2005). Leading or misleading? Distributed leadership and school improvement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 255-265.
15.
HellerM. F.FirestoneW. A. (1995). Who’s in charge here? Sources of leadership for change in eight schools. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 65-86.
16.
JacksonA.DavisG. A. (2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
17.
KatzenmeyerM.MollerG. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
18.
LeithwoodK. A.JantziD. (2000). Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication. School Leadership & Management, 20, 415-434.
19.
LeithwoodK. A.RiehlC. J. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Philadelphia, PA: Laboratory for Student Success, Temple University.
20.
MacBeathJ. (2005). Leadership as distributed: A matter of practice. School Leadership and Management, 25, 349-366.
21.
MarzanoR. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22.
MayrowetzD.MurphyJ.Seashore-LouisK.SmylieM. A. (2007). Distributed leadership as work redesign: Retrofitting the job characteristics model. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6, 69-101.
23.
McEwinC. K.DickinsonT. S.JacobsonM. G. (2004). Programs and practices in K-8 schools: Do they meet the educational needs of young adolescents?Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
24.
MillerB.MoonJ.ElkoS. (2000). Teacher leadership in mathematics and science: Casebook and facilitator’s guide. Portsmith, NH: Heinemann.
25.
MuthK. D.AlvermanD. (1999). Teaching and learning in the middle grades (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
26.
National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP). (2006). Breaking ranks in the middle: Strategies for leading middle level reform. Reston, VA: Author.
27.
National Middle School Association (NMSA). (1995). This we believe: Developmentally responsive middle level schools. Columbus, OH: Author.
28.
National Middle School Association (NMSA). (2010). This we believe: Keys to educating young adolescents. Westerville, OH: Author.
29.
OddenA. (2009, December9). We know how to turn schools around—we just haven’t done it, Education Week, 29(14), 22-23.
30.
OddenA.ArchibaldS.FermanichM.GallagherH. A. (2002). A cost framework for professional development. Journal of Education Finance, 28(1), 51-74.
31.
ScribnerJ. P.SawyerR. K.WatsonS. T.MyersV. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 67-100. doi:10.1177/0013161X06293631
32.
SilvaD.GimbertB.NolanJ. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record, 102, 779-804.
33.
SmylieM. A.ConleyS.MarksH. M. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 162-188). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
SmylieM. A.DennyJ. W. (1990). Teacher leadership: Tensions and ambiguities in organizational perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 235-259. doi:10.1177/0013161X90026003003
35.
SmylieM. A.Seashore-LouisK. (2007). Trust and the development of distributed leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 17, 469-503.
36.
SpillaneJ. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69, 143-150.
37.
SpillaneJ. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
SpillaneJ. P.HallettT.DiamondJ. B. (2003). Forms of capital and construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76, 1-17.
39.
SpillaneJ. P.HalversonR.DiamondJ. B.(2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
40.
SpillaneJ. P.HalversonR.DiamondJ. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 533-543.
41.
TimperleyH. S. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 395-420.
42.
ValentineJ. W.ClarkD. C.HackmannD. G.PetzkoV. N. (2002). A national study of leadership in middle level schools. Volume 1: A national study of middle level leaders and school programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
43.
ValentineJ. W.ClarkD. C.IrvinJ. L.KeefeJ. W.MeltonG. (1993). Leadership in middle level education: A national survey of middle level leaders and schools (Vol. 1). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
WoodsP. A.BennettN.HarveyJ.WiseC.(2004). Variabilities and dualities in distributed leadership: Findings from a systematic literature review. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 32, 439-457.
46.
York-BarrJ.DukeK. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74, 255-316.
