This mixed methods study examines the impact of a freshmen transition program for at-risk students at a large urban high school. The overall experiences of the participants affirmed that transition programs for at-risk students must provide a sense of belonging, teachers must be able to build strong relationships with students, and life-skills should be an essential component. This study has implications for schools who are presently implementing a freshmen transition program, or for school districts investigating the possibility of adopting such a curriculum.
AllensworthE. M.EastonJ. Q. (2007, July). What matters for staying on-track and graduating in Chicago public high schools. Research Report presented at the Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
2.
AlspaughJ. W. (1998). Achievement loss associated with the transition to middle school and high school. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 20-26.
3.
BakerJ.SansoneJ. (1990). Interventions with students at risk for dropping out of school: A high school responds. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 181-186.
4.
BonvinP.BlessG.SchuepbachM. (2008). Grade retention: Decision-making and effects on learning as well as social and emotional development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 1-19.
5.
BowmanL. J. (2005, Spring). Grade retention: Is it a help or hindrance to student academic achievement?Preventing School Failure, 49(3), 42-46.
DoyleR. P. (1989). The resistance of conventional wisdom to research evidence: The case of retention in grade. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 215-220.
11.
DuBoisD. L.EitelS. K.FelnerR. D. (1994). Effects of family environment and parent-child relationships on school adjustment during the transition to early adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 405-414.
12.
FetlerM. (1989). School dropout rates, academic performance, size, and poverty: Correlates of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 109-116.
GoldschmidtP.WangJ. (1999). When can schools affect dropout behavior? A longitudinal multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 715-738.
15.
HermannJ.SambranoS.SpringerF. J.NistlerM.SaleE.BrounsteinP. J.. . . PanW. (2002). The national cross-site evaluation of high-risk youth programs: Findings on designing and implementing effective prevention programs for youth at high risk (Monograph Series No. 3). Rockville, MD: National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information.
16.
HolmesC. T. (1983). The fourth R: Retention. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17(1), 1-6.
17.
HorwitzA.SnipesJ. (2008, Spring). Supporting successful transitions to high school (Research Brief). Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools.
18.
King-RiceJ. (2001). Explaining the negative impact of the transition from middle to high school on student performance in mathematics and science. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 372-400.
KotabeM.SahayA.AulakhP. S. (1996). Emerging role of technology licensing in the development of global product strategy: Conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 60, 73-88.
21.
LehrC. A. (2004, August). Increasing school completion: Learning from research-based practices that work. National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Research to Practice Brief, 3(3), 1-4.
22.
LeuchoviusD. (2006, July). The role of parents in dropout prevention: Strategies that promote graduation and school achievement (Parent Brief). Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Secondary Education and Transition (NCSET) and PACER Center. Retrieved from http://www.ncset.org/publications/parent/NCSETParent_Jul06.pdf
23.
MaX. (2003). Sense of belonging to school: Can schools make a difference?Journal of Educational Research, 96, 340-349.
24.
MarksH. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153-184.
25.
McIntoshJ.WhiteS. H. (2006). Building for freshmen success: High schools working as professional learning communities. American Secondary Education, 34(2), 40-49.
26.
MeiselsS. J.LiawF.-R. (1993). Failure in grade: Do retained students catch up?Journal of Educational Research, 87, 69-77.
27.
MooreD. S.McCabeG. P. (1989). Introduction to the practice of statistics. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
28.
MurphyM. M. (1998). Character education in America’s blue ribbon schools. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
29.
NeildR. C.BalfanzR.HerzogL. (2007). An early warning system. Educational Leadership, 65(2), 28-33.
30.
NiklasonL. (1984). Non-promotion: A pseudoscientific solution. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 485-499.
31.
NormanD. W. (1978). Farming systems research to improve the livelihood of small farmers. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60, 813-818.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
PearsonL. C.BanerjiM. (1993). Effects of a ninth-grade dropout prevention program on student academic achievement, school attendance, and dropout rate. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 247-256.
35.
PrinciottaD.ReynaR. (2009). Achieving graduation for all. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices.
36.
RoderickM. (1994). Grade retention and school dropout: Investigating the association. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 729-759.
37.
RoseJ. S.MedwayF.CantrellV. L.MarusS. H. (1983). A fresh look at the retention-promotion controversy. Journal of School Psychology, 21, 201-211.
38.
RumbergerR. W. (1987). High school dropouts: A review of issues and evidence. Review of Educational Research, 57, 101-121.
39.
SandersP. (1982). Phenomenology: A new way of viewing organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 7, 353-360.
40.
SchlossbergN. (1981). A model for analyzing human adaptation to transition. The Counseling Psychologist, 9(2), 2-18.
41.
SmithM. L.ShepardL. A. (1987). What doesn’t work: Explaining policies of retention in the early grades. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 129-134.
42.
SomersC. L.PiliawskyM. (2004). Drop-out prevention among urban, African American adolescents: Program evaluation and practical implications. Preventing School Failure, 48(3), 17-22.
43.
StephensG. (1997). Youth at risk: Saving the world’s most precious resource. Bethesda, MD: World Future Society.
44.
ThurlowM. L.SinclairM. F.JohnsonD. R. (2002). Students with disabilities who drop out of school: Implications for policy and practice. National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Issue Brief, 1(2), 1-8.
45.
VenturaS. J.HamiltonB. E. (2011). U.S. teenage birthrate resumes decline (NCHS Data Brief No. 58). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
46.
YampolskayaS.BrownE. C.GreenbaumP. E. (2002, Summer). Early pregnancy among adolescent females with serious emotional disturbances: Risk factors and outcomes. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 108-115.