Decisions regarding school improvement are based on observations of adults. A more accurate picture of institutional assets and limitations emerges when observations of students are also considered. This presentation shows how student polling can help principals enhance conditions of learning and safety. Implications of Cyberbully Poll results at one junior high are summarized so that stakeholders can understand local severity, motivation for abuse, and need for greater parent orientation to this danger. The leadership role of principles is emphasized.
AgatstonP.KowalskiR.LimberS. (2007). Students’ perspectives on cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S59-S60.
2.
BattistoniR. (2004). Teaching high schoolers participatory democracy. The Education Digest, 70(3), 56-58.
3.
BaumanS. (2011). Cyberbullying: What counselors need to know. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
4.
BissonetteA. (2009). Cyber law: Maximizing safety and minimizing risk in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5.
BlackS. (2005, November). Listening to students. American School Board Journal, 192, 39-41.
6.
BlackhurstR. (2008, June22). A class apart. Financial Times, pp. 1-2.
7.
BonkC. (2009). The world is open: How web technology is revolutionizing education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
CollinsA.HalversonR. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
ColorosoB. (2004). The bully, the bullied and the bystander: From preschool to high school—How parents and teachers can help break the cycle of violence. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
10.
ColorosoB. (2005). A bully’s bystanders are never innocent. The Education Digest, 70(8), 49-51.
11.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12.
EckholmE.ZezimaK. (2010, March30). Six teenagers are charged after classmate’s suicide. The New York Times, p. A14.
13.
EpsteinR. (2007). The case against adolescents: Rediscovering the adult in every teen. Sanger, CA: Quill Driver.
14.
FreyK.KirschsteinM.SnellJ. (2005, May). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: An experimental trial of the “Steps to Respect” program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 479-490.
15.
GirodM.PardalesM.CavanaughS.WadsworthP. (2005, April). By teens, for teachers: A descriptive study of adolescence. American Secondary Education, 33, 4-19.
16.
GoldingW. (1954). Lord of the flies. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
17.
KowalskiR.LimberS.AgatstonP. (2008). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18.
LawN.YuenA.FoxR. (2011). Educational innovations beyond technology: Nurturing leadership and establishing learning organizations. New York, NY: Springer.
19.
LevinB. (2000). Putting students at the center in education reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1, 155-172.
20.
LevineP. (2007). The future of democracy: Developing the next generation of American citizens. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.
21.
LodgeC. (2005). From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: Problematizing student participation in school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 6, 135-146.
22.
RideoutV.FoehrU.RobertsD. (2010, January). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Retrieved March 15, 2011, from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf
23.
RiversI.PoteatV.NoretN.AshurstN. (2009). Observing bullying at school. The mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 211-223.
24.
RosenL. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
SalmivalliC.KaukiainenA.VoetenM. (2005, September). Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 465-487.
26.
SchultzB. (Ed.). (2011). Listening to and learning from students: Possibilities for teaching, learning and curriculum. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
27.
ShariffS. (2008). Cyber-bullying: Issues and solutions for the school, the classroom, and the home. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
StromP.StromR. (2005). Cyberbullying by adolescents: A preliminary assessment. The Educational Forum, 70, 21-35.
29.
StromP.StromR. (2009). Adolescents in the Internet age. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
30.
StromP.StromR.WingC. (2008). Polling students about conditions of learning. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 92, 292-304.
31.
StromP.StromR.WingC.BeckertT. (2009). Adolescent learning and the Internet: Implications for school leadership and student engagement in learning. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 93, 111-121.
32.
StromR.StromP. (2011). A paradigm for intergenerational learning. In LondonM. (Ed.), Oxford university handbook of lifelong learning (pp. 133-146). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
TapscottD.WilliamsA. (2010). MacroWikinomics: Rebooting business and the world.New York, NY: Penguin.
34.
TrillingB.FadelC. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
WillardN. (2007). The authority and responsibility of school officials in responding to cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 564-565.
