This study investigated the stability of students’ grades in high school courses during the academic year. Records of over 8,000 high school students from five large southeastern high schools were analyzed to determine the relationship between the first achievement grade students were assigned during an academic term and their final course grades. Results showed that grades were remarkably stable, with correlations between first achievement grades and final course grades generally ranging between +.4 and +.7. Correlations were typically larger for 9th- and 10th-grade courses than 11th- and 12th-grade courses. Multiple regression results revealed that differences among departments (subject areas) were statistically significant, but differences among schools were not. Differences related to student gender, grade level, ethnicity, and poverty level also were statistically significant but modest in magnitude. The implications of such stability and its probable influence on student motivation are discussed.
BennettR. E.GottesmanR. L.RockD. A.CerulloF. (1993). Influence of behavior perceptions and gender on teachers’ judgments of students’ academic skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 247-356.
2.
BerlinerD. C.CasanovaU. (1996). Putting research to work in your school. Arlington Heights, IL: IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing.
3.
BrookhartS. M. (1991). Grading practices and validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(1), 35-36.
4.
BrookhartS. M. (1993). Teachers’ grading practices: Meaning and values. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 123-142.
5.
BrookhartS. M. (1994). Teachers’ grading: Practice and theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 279-301.
6.
BrookhartS. M. (2004). Grading. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Merrill, Prentice-Hall.
7.
BrookhartS. M.NitkoA. J. (2008). Assessment and grading in classrooms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
8.
CizekG. J. (1996). Grades: The final frontier in assessment reform. NASSP Bulletin, 80, 103-110.
9.
CizekG. J.FitzgeraldS. M.RachorR. E. (1996). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3, 159-179.
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
11.
CrossL. H.FraryR. B. (1999). Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike. Applied Measurement in Education, 12(1), 53-72.
12.
EcclesJ. S.HaroldR. D. (1993). Parent-school involvement in the early adolescent years. Teachers College Record, 94, 568-587.
13.
EricksonJ. A. (2010). Grading practices: The third rail. Principal Leadership, 10(7), 22-24.
14.
FraryR. B.CrossL. H.WeberL. J. (1993). Testing and grading practices and opinions of secondary teachers of academic subjects: Implications for instruction in measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 23-30.
15.
FrisbieD. A.WaltmanK. K. (1992). Developing a personal grading plan. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 11(3), 35-42.
16.
GoldenbergC. (1992). The limits of expectations: A case for case knowledge about teacher expectation effects. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 517-544.
17.
GoldschmidtP.WangJ. (1999). When can schools affect dropout behavior? A longitudinal multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 715-738.
18.
GuskeyT. R. (2002). Computerized gradebooks and the myth of objectivity. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 775-780.
19.
GuskeyT. R. (2006). Making high school grades meaningful. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 670-675.
20.
GuskeyT. R.BaileyJ. M. (2001). Developing grading and reporting systems for student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
HaladynaT. M. (1999). A complete guide to student grading. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
HamptonN. Z.MasonE. (2003). Learning disabilities, gender, sources of efficacy, self-efficacy beliefs, and academic achievement in high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 101-112.
24.
LeeV. E.BurkamD. T. (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 353-393.
25.
LinnenbrinkE. A.PintrichP. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313-327.
26.
McMillanJ. H. (2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20-32.
27.
McMillanJ. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decision making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34-43.
28.
McMillanJ. H.NashS. (2000, April). Teacher classroom assessment and grading practice decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
29.
McMillanJ. H.WorkmanD.MyranS. (1999, April). Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
30.
PageE. B. (1958). Teacher comments and student performance: A seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 173-181.
31.
RandallJ.EngelhardG. (2010). Examining the grading practices of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1372-1380.
32.
ReevesD. (2011). Elements of grading. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
33.
RoderickM.CamburnE. (1999). Risk and recovery from course failure in the early years of high school. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 303-343.
34.
SimmonsR. G.BlythD. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. Hawthorne, NY: DeGruyter.
35.
SinghK. (1998). Part-time employment in high school and its effect on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 91(3), 131-139.
36.
SmithJ. K. (2003). Reconsidering reliability in classroom assessment and grading. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 26-33.
37.
StewartL. G.WhiteM. A. (1976). Teacher comments, letter grades and student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 488-500.
38.
StigginsR. J.FrisbieD. A.GriswoldP. A. (1989). Inside high school grading practices: Building a research agenda. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(2), 5-14.
39.
TruogA. L.FriedmanS. J. (1996, April). Evaluating high school teachers’ written grading policies from a measurement perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY.
40.
WelchM. E.D’AgostinoJ. (2009). Fostering consistency between standards-based grades and large scale assessment results. In GuskeyT. R. (Ed.), Practical solutions to serious problems in standards-based grading (pp. 75-104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
41.
WillinghamW. W.PollackJ. M.LewisC. (2002). Grades and test scores: Accounting for observed differences. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 1-37.
