Weick’s theory of sensemaking is used to analyze findings from a qualitative study of the implementation of a district-initiated adolescent intervention literacy course in two urban secondary schools. The authors concluded that implementation of the literacy course was hampered because district administrators, building leaders, teachers, and students all constructed multiple meanings of the course’s purpose and priority within the district. Teachers expected to implement the initiative constructed their identities as Language Arts and English teachers and did not see themselves as literacy specialists.
Alvermann, D.E. ( 2001). Reading adolescents’ reading identities: Looking back to see ahead. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy , 44, 676-690.
2.
Alvermann, D.E. ( 2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 189-208.
3.
Anderson, V., & Roit, M. ( 1993). Planning and implementing collaborative strategy instruction for delayed readers in grades 6-10. Elementary School Journal , 94, 121-137.
4.
Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. ( 2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy (Report to Carnegie Corporation of America). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
5.
Connell, J., & Klem, A. ( 2000). You can get there from here: Using a theory of change approach to plan urban education reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11, 93-120.
6.
Corcoran, T., Fuhrman, S., & Belcher, C. ( 2001). The district role in instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 78-84.
7.
Datnow, A. ( 2005). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 121-153.
8.
Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J.B. (1993). Strategy mastery by at-risk students: Not a simple matter. Elementary School Journal, 94, 153-167.
9.
Dole, J.A., Brown, K.J., & Trathen, W. ( 1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly , 31, 62-88.
10.
Duffy, G.G. ( 1993). Rethinking strategy instruction: Four teachers’ development and their low achievers’ understandings. Elementary School Journal, 93, 231-247.
11.
Easton, L.B. ( 2008). From professional development to professional learning . Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 755-761.
12.
Frey, B.B., Lee, S.W., Tollefson, N., Pass, L., & Massengill, D. (2005). Balanced literacy in an urban district. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 272-280.
13.
Fullan, M. ( 1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform . London, England: Falmer.
14.
Fullan, M. ( 2002). The role of leadership in the promotion of knowledge management in schools. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice , 8, 409-419.
15.
Gambrell, L. B., Morrow, L. M., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2007). Best practices in literacy instruction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
Harris, A. ( 2005). Leading from the chalk-face: An overview of school leadership . Leadership, 1, 73-87.
17.
Jacobs, V.A. ( 2008). Adolescent literacy: Putting the crisis in context. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 7-39.
18.
Kruse, S.D. ( 2008). Reflections on leading and learning for change. Education and Urban Society, 40, 655-669.
19.
Lipman, P. ( 2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
Merriam, S.B. ( 1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
21.
Merriam, S.B., & Associates. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Moje, E.B., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. ( 2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 107-154.
23.
Moore, D.W., Bean, T.W., Birdyshaw, D., & Rycik, J.A. ( 1999). Adolescent literacy: A position statement. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43, 97-112.
24.
Parris, S.R., & Block, C.C. ( 2007). The expertise of adolescent literacy teachers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50, 582-596.
25.
Patton, M.Q. ( 2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Ratekin, N., Simpson, M., Alvermann, D., & Dishner, E. ( 1985). Why teachers resist content reading instruction. Journal of Reading, 28, 432-437.
27.
Ryan, G.W., & Bernard, H.R. ( 2003). Techniques to identify themes in qualitative data. Field Methods, 15, 85-109.
28.
Santa, C.M. ( 2006). A vision for adolescent literacy: Ours or theirs? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49, 466-476.
29.
Scott, C., & Bagaka’s, J.G. (2004). Moving district reform into schools: Links between teachers’ perceptions of district-wide reform efforts, participation in professional activities, and student achievement . Planning and Changing, 35, 69-84.
30.
University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning. ( 2007). SIM: Strategic instruction model. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
31.
Wagner, T., Kegan, R., Lahey, L., Lemmons, R., Garnier, J., Helsing, D., . . . Rasmussen, H. ( 2006). Change leadership: A practical guide to transforming our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
