United States schools are not providing students with the mathematical background necessary to compete on an international level and become successful adults. Recently, educators and researchers have focused on learning what factors might attribute to this lack of mathematical knowledge. However, few studies have searched for answers from the students themselves.The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of how recent high school graduates, enrolled in college developmental mathematics courses, perceived the mathematics education they received from their K-12 institution.
ACT. (2004a). Crisis at the core: Preparing all students for college and work. Iowa City, IA: Author.
2.
ACT. (2004b). On course for success: A close look at selected high school courses that prepare all students for college. Iowa City, IA: Author .
3.
ACT. (2005). Courses count: Preparing students for postsecondary success. Iowa City, IA: Author.
4.
Adelman, C. ( 2004). Principal indicators of student academic histories in postsecondary education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Statistics .
5.
Barth, P. ( 2003). A common core curriculum for the new century. Thinking K-16, 7(1), 31.
6.
Beaton, A.E., Mullis, I.V., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J., Kelly, D.L., & Smith, T.A. ( 1996, November). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) . Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College . Retrieved from http://timss.bc.edu/timss1995i/TIMSSPDF/BMathAll.pdf
7.
Bottoms, G. ( 2006). Students can’t wait: Schools must turn knowledge into action to raise achievement and graduation rates. Paper presented at the High Schools that Work Conference, Orlando, FL.
8.
Bridgeland, J.M., Dilulio, J.J., & Morison, K.B. ( 2006). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts . Washington, DC: Civic Enterprises .
9.
Darling-Hammond, L. ( 1997). What matters most: 21st century teaching. Education Digest, 63(3), 4-10.
Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2004). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Board, 106, 1047-1085.
12.
Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2007). A marshal plan for teaching. Social Policy , 37(3/4), 41-44.
13.
Design Science. (2006). Why is math accessibility important? Retrieved from http://www.dessci.com/en/solutions/access/mathskills.htm
14.
Diament, M. ( 2005). High-school students are poorly prepared for college, survey finds. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(24), 39.
15.
Gates Foundation. (2006). All students college ready: Findings from the foundation’s education work 2000-2006. Retrieved from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/learning/Documents/EducationFindings2000-2006.pdf
16.
Gonzales, P., Guzmán, J.C., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., & Williams, T. ( 2004). Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 (NCES 2005-005). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
17.
Harvey, J., & Housman, N. ( 2004). Crisis or possibility? Conversations about the American high school. Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Leadership.
18.
Housman, N. ( 2006). High school transformation: Core principles. Leadership, 35(5), 14-15.
19.
Kafoussi, S. ( 2005). Parents’ and teachers’ interaction concerning students’ mathematics learning. Retrieved from http://math.unipa.it/~grim/cieaem/cieaem57_kafoussi.pdf
20.
Lambert, M.B., & Lowry, L.K. ( 2004). Knowing and being known: Personalization as a foundation for student learning. Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
21.
Lemke, M., Sen, A., Pahlke, E., Partelow, L., Miller, D., Williams, T., . . . Merriam, S.B. ( 2002). Qualitative research in practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Merriam, S.B. ( 2002). Qualitative research in practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M. ( 1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
National Academy of Sciences. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education . Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
25.
National Association of Secondary School Principals. ( 2004). Breaking ranks II: Strategies for leading high school reform. Reston, VA: Author .
26.
Noddings, N. ( 2003). Is teaching a practice? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37, 241-251.
27.
Pathways to College Network. (2003). Strategies for success: Six stories of increasing college access . Boston, MA: Author.
28.
Priesz, P.A. ( 2006). Leaders for high school reform. Leadership , 35(5), 8-36.
29.
Research and Policy Committee of the Committee for Economic Development. (2003). Learning for the future: Changing the culture of math and science education to ensure a competitive workforce. New York, NY: Library of Congress.
30.
Rongjin, H., Leung, F.K. ( 2005). Parental influence on Chinese children’s mathematics learning. Retrieved from http://www.math.admu.edu.ph/tsg22/huang.html
31.
Scarpello, G. ( 2007). Helping students get past math anxiety. Techniques, 82(6), 34-35.
32.
Southern Regional Education Board. (2001). Closing the achievement gap: A high schools that work design for challenged schools (SREB Publication No. 01V57). Atlanta, GA: Author.
33.
Southern Regional Education Board. (2006). Making middle grades work: An enhanced design to get all students to standards (SREB Publication No. 06V15). Atlanta, GA: Author.
34.
Tael, J., & Eberhart, N. ( 1999). Statewide school-college (K-16) partnerships to improve student performance. Denver, CO: SHEEO.
35.
Thornburg, D.D. ( 2000). Technology in k-12 education: Envisioning a new future [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://www.csbsju.edu/education/pdfs/Thornburg.pdf
36.
Tirozzi, G.N. ( 2005, September). A blueprint for change. Retrieved from http://www.schoolcounselor.org/printarticle.asp?article=806
37.
U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Digest of education statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d97/d97t135.asp
38.
Wenglinsky, H. ( 1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center.
39.
Wimberly, G.L., & Noeth, R.J. ( 2005). College readiness begins in middle school: ACT policy report. Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.k12.wa.us/SecondaryEducation/pubdocs/CollegeReadinessBeginsinMiddleSchool.doc
40.
Zahorchak, G.L. ( 2006). Preparing students for the future. Edtech , 4(4), 7.
