There is a paucity of studies that assess the influence of communication in facilitating educational change. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of communication for high school principals in the implementation of education reform. Overall, the study found that top-down communication strategy was more prevalent in high schools. These findings are consonant with complexity theory, which posits that self-organizing activities are best promoted by interactions and connection among staff members.
Anderson, L.W., & Shirley, J.R. (1995). High school principals and school reform: Lessons learned from a statewide study of project re: learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(3), 405-423.
2.
Bacharach, S.B., Bamberger, P., & Mitchell, S. (1990). Work design, role conflict, and role ambiguity: The case of elementary and secondary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 415-432.
3.
Bass, B.M. (1981). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
4.
Benveniste, G. (1989). Mastering the politics of planning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chubb, J.E. (1988). Why the current wave of school reform will fail . Public Interest, 90, 28-49.
7.
Corcoran, T.B., Walker, L.J., & White, J.L. (1988). Working in urban schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
8.
Datnow, A., & Castellano, M.E. (2001). Managing and guiding school reform: Leadership in success for all schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 219-249.
9.
Deal, J.E., & Celotti, L.D. (1980). How much influence do (and can) educational administrators have on classrooms? Phi Delta Kappan, 61(7), 471-473.
10.
Dow, I.I., & Whitehead, R.Y. (1980). Curriculum implementation study, physical education K-6: Personal well being. Unpublished report, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
11.
Dreeban, R. (1973). The school as a workplace. In R. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 450-473). Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
12.
Eagly, A.H., Karau, S.J., & Johnson, B.T. (1992). Gender and leadership style among school principals: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 76-102.
13.
Education Commission, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China. (2004, December). Progress report on the education reform (Vol. 3). Hong Kong: Author.
14.
Fullan, M.G. (1994). Implementation of innovations. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 2839-2847). Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon.
15.
Fullan, M.G. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer.
16.
Fullan, M.G. (2001). Understanding change. In M. Fullan (Ed.), Leading in a culture of change (1st ed., pp. 5-7). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Fullan, M.G. (2005). Leadership and sustainability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
18.
Fullan, M.G. (2006). The future of educational change: System thinkers in action. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 113-122.
19.
Fullan, M.G., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York, Columbia University: Teachers College Press.
20.
Hallinger, P., & Anast, L. (1992). The Indiana Principal Leadership Academy assessing school reform for principals. Education and Urban Society , 24(3), 410-430.
21.
Halpin, A.W., & Winer, B.J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions . In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement (pp. 39-51). Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.
22.
Houts, P. (1975). The changing role of the elementary school principal . The National Elementary School Principal, 55(2), 62-72.
23.
Howe, W. (1994). Leadership in educational administration. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 3276-3284). Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon.
24.
Leithwood, K.A., & Montgomery, D.J. (1982). The role of the elementary school principal in program improvement. Review of Educational Research, 52, 309-339.
25.
Louis, K.S., & Miles, M. (1990). Improving the urban high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecot, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
27.
Murphy, J. (1989). Principal instructional leadership. In L. S. Lotto & P. W. Thurston (Eds.), Advances in educational administration (Vol. 1B, pp. 162-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
28.
Murphy, J. (1990). Effective school management. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Supplementary Vol. 2, pp. 73-77). Oxford , U.K.: Pergamon.
29.
Murphy, J. (1994). Redefining the principalship in restructuring schools. NASSP Bulletin, 78(560), 94-99.
30.
Murphy, J., & Louis, K.S. (1999). Introduction: Framing the project. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of educational administration (pp. xxi-xvii). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Neufeld, B. (1997). Responding to the expressed needs of urban middle school principals. Urban Education, 31(5), 490-509.
32.
Neuman, M., & Mohr, N. (2001). Cracking the mathematics and science barrier: Principles for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 85(623), 43-52.
33.
Peterson, K.D. (1990). Effective school principals. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Supplementary Vol. 2, pp. 5268-5273). Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon.
34.
Willower, D.J. (1991). Micropolitics and the sociology of school organizations . Education and Urban Society, 23, 442-454.
