Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) included substantive changes in the area of disciplining students with disabilities. Historically, discipline has been a divisive issue within the field of special education. Many administrators and teachers believe differential treatment has been afforded to this population, fostering a system that promotes separatism and inequality. The authors provide an overview of IDEA 2004 provisions on discipline and outline practical recommendations that will aid school personnel maintain a safe environment for all students. Areas of discussion include suspension procedures, functional behavioral assessments, manifestation determination meetings, and interim alternative educational settings. The authors also provide a list of potential alternatives to disciplinary exclusions.
Alberto, P.A., & Troutman, A.C. (2006). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
2.
Coleman, M., Wheeler, L., & Webber, J. (1993). Research on interpersonal problem-solving training: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 25-37.
3.
Etscheidt, S. (2006). Seeking an interim alternative education placement for dangerous or disruptive students with disabilities: Four burdens for the school district to meet. American Secondary Education, 34(2), 67-84.
4.
Finn, C. E., Rotherham, A. J., & Hokanson, C. R. (Eds.). (2001). Conclusions and principles of reform. In C. E. Finn, A. J. Rotherham, & C. R. Hokanson (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 335-347). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved March 7, 2005, from http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=110&subsecID=181&ontented=3344
5.
Fort Smith Public Schools, 29 IDELR 399 (SEA Ark. 1998).
6.
General Accounting Office. (2001). Student discipline: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Report to the Committees on Appropriations, U.S. Senate and House of Representatives) . Washington, DC: Author.
7.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. §1415(k) (2004a).
8.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Part B Regulations, 34 C.F.R. §300.530-536 (2004b).
9.
Katsiyannis, A., & Maag, W.J. (2001). Manifestation determination as a golden fleece . Exceptional Children, 68, 85-96.
10.
Katsiyannis, A., & Smith, C. (2003). Disciplining students with disabilities: Legal trends and the issue of interim alternative education settings. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 410-418.
11.
Maag, J.W., & Katsiyannis, A. (2006). Behavioral intervention plans: Legal and practical considerations for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorder, 31, 348-362.
12.
Maloney, D. (2007). Restorative community service: Earning redemption, gaining skills, and proving worth. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 15(4), 214-219.
13.
No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. 70 Section 6301 et seq. (2001).
14.
Peterson, R.L. (2005). Ten alternatives to suspension. Impact, Quarterly Publication of the Institute on Community Integration, 18(2), 10-11.
15.
Quinn, M.M., Osher, D., Warger, C.L., Hanley, T.V., Bader, B.D., & Hoffman, C.C. (2000). Teaching and working with children who have emotional and behavioral challenges. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
16.
Rhode, G. (1996). In-school suspension program. In H. K. Reavis, M. T. Sweeten , W. R. Jensen, D. P. Morgan, D. J. Andrews, & S. Fister (Eds.), Best practices: Behavioral and educational strategies for teachers (pp. 87-98). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
17.
Sasso, G.M., Melloy, K.J., & Kavale, K.A. (1990). Generalization, maintenance, and behavioral covariation associated with social skills training through structured learning. Behavioral Disorders, 16(1), 9-22.
18.
Sattes, B. (1985). Parent involvement: A review of the literature . Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
19.
Webb, L.D., Brigman, G.A., & Campbell, C. (2005). Linking school counselors and student success: A replication of the student success skills approach targeting the academic social competence of students. Professional School Counseling , 8(15), 407-413.
20.
Yell, M.L. (2006). The law and special education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
21.
Yell, M.L., Shriner, J.G., & Katsiyannis, A. (2006). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. Focus on Exceptional Children , 31(1), 1-24.
22.
Zhang, D., Katsiyannis, A., & Herbst, M. (2004). Disciplinary exclusions in special education: A four-year analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 337-347.
23.
Zirpoli, T.J. (2005). Behavior management: Applications for teachers (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/MerrillPrentice Hall.
