Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article contains an analysis of a component of a large-scale reform effort in an urban school district that entailed placing high school students identified as underperforming in literacy in separate classes aimed at accelerating their learning. The relationship between students’ academic performance and social backgrounds, school characteristics, and placement in these classes was analyzed for two cohorts of ninth graders. Although most students were placed according to their academic needs, there was evidence that race/ethnicity, language, and school socioeconomic status also influenced student placements. The findings suggest that the structural innovations of large-scale reforms must be accompanied by attention to the cultural dimensions of education reform.

Keywords

achievement gap academic interventions systemic reform tracking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cicourel, A. V. , & Kitsuse, J. I. (1963). The educational decisionmakers. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

Gamoran, A. , & Mare, R. D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 1146-1183.

Garet, M. S. , & Delany, B. (1988). Students, courses, stratification. Sociology of Education, 61(2), 61-77.

Hubbard, L. , Mehan, H. , & Stein, M. K. (2006). Reform as learning: When school reform collides with school culture and community politics. New York: Routledge.

Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality. New York: Teachers College Press.

Mehan, H. , Hubbard, L. , & Stein, M. K. (2005). When reforms travel: The sequel. Journal of Educational Change, 6(4), 329-362.

Mehan, H. B. , Hertweck, A. , & Meihls, J. L. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Mercer, J. R. (1973). Labeling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Mickelson, R. (2001). Subverting Swann: First and second generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenberg schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 215-252.

10.

Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

11.

Oakes, J. (1994). More than misapplied technology: A normative and political response to Hallinan on tracking. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 84-89.

12.

Oakes, J. , & Guiton, G. (1995). Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 3-33.

13.

Oakes, J. , Hunter Quartz, K. , Ryan, S. , & Lipton, M. (2000). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in education reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

14.

Omi, M. , & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.

15.

Resnick, L. , & Hall, M. W. (1998). Learning organizations for sustainable education reform. Daedalus, 15(3), 89-118.

16.

Rosenbaum, J. E. (1978). The structure of opportunity in school. Social Forces, 57(1), 236-256.

17.

San Diego City Schools . (2000, March 13). Transcript of town hall meeting at Lewis Middle School: The blueprint for student success in a standards-based district. San Diego, CA: Author.

18.

San Diego City Schools . (2002). Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (SDRT) summaries: 1999-2000. San Diego, CA: Author.

19.

San Diego City Schools . (2003). Fact sheet: Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test. San Diego, CA: Author.

20.

San Diego City Schools Institute for Learning . (2000). The blueprint for student success. San Diego, CA: Author.

21.

Staiger, A. (2004). Whiteness as giftedness: Racial formation at an urban high school. Social Problems, 51(2), 161-181.

22.

Stein, M. K. , Hubbard, L. , & Mehan, H. (2004). Reform ideas that travel far afield: The two cultures of reform in New York City’s District #2 and San Diego. Journal of Educational Change, 5(2), 161-197.

Genre Studies in the San Diego City Schools: Accelerating or Tracking?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References