Algebra student achievement has become a matterfor increasedfocus in recent years, as educators answer calls for reform, including the standards documents of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and the No Child Left Behind mandates. A meta-analysis of 35 independent experimental studies shows that six teaching method categories have positive effects on student achievement in the secondary-algebra classroom. Teaching method categories are defined and ranked according to their effect sizes. Recommendations for practitioners are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allsop, D. H. (1997). Using class wide peer tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem-solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 18(6), 367-379.
2.
Allsop, D. H. (1999). Using modeling, manipulatives, and mnemonics with eighth-grade math students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(2), 74-81.
3.
Austin, J. D., & Vollrath, H.J. (1989). Representing, solving, and using algebraic equations. Mathematics Teacher, 82, 608-612.
4.
Brenner, M.E., Brar, T., Duran, R., Mayer, R.E., & Moseley, B., Smith, B., & Webb, D. (1997). Learning by understanding: The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. American Education Research Journal, 34, 663-689.
5.
Carroll, W. M. (1995). Increasing mathematics confidence by using worked examples. Mathematics Teacher, 88, 276-279.
6.
Choike, J. R. (2000). Teaching strategies for "algebra for all."Mathematics Teacher, 93 (7), 556-560.
7.
Clay, D. W. (1998). A study to determine the effects of a non-traditional approach to algebra instruction on student achievement. (Res. Rep.). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED428963).
8.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Davis, B. M. (1998). Middle school algebra: Variables for success. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED436363).
10.
Denson, P. S. (1989). A comparison of the effectiveness of the Saxon and Dolciani texts and theories about the teaching of high school algebra (Doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 10A.
11.
Dick, D. (1980). An experimental study of the effects of required homework review vs. review on request upon achievement. (Res. Rep.). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED194320).
12.
Elshafei, D. L. (1998). A comparison of problem-based and traditional learning in Algebra II (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 1A.
13.
Farrell, J. R. (1980). The effects of individualized instruction on the achievement of cognitive and affective objectives by selected first-year algebra students (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 12A.
14.
Feigenbaum, R. (2000). Algebra for students with learning disabilities. Mathematics Teacher, 93(4), 270-274.
15.
Gay, L. R. (1996). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
16.
Gesshel-Green, H. A. (1986). The effect of interactive microcomputer graphics on student achievement and retention in second year algebra in an academic high school (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 02A.
17.
Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
18.
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
Goins, K B. (2001). Comparing the effects of visual and algebra tile manipulative methods on student skill and understanding of polynomial multiplication. (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 12A.
20.
Gordon, J.T. (1988). Writing: A teaching strategy for elementary algebraic fractions. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 10(1), 29-36.
21.
Haas, M. S. (2002). The influence of teaching methods on student achievement on Virginia's end-of-course standards of learning test for Algebra I. Retrieved February 16, 2004, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-10062002-202857/
22.
Hawkins, V. J. (1982). A comparison of two methods of instruction, a saturated learning environment and traditional learning environment: Its effects on achievement and retention among female adolescents in first-year algebra (Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 02A.
23.
Heath, R. D. (1987). The effects of calculators and computers on problemsolving ability, computational ability and attitude toward mathematics (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 05A.
24.
Hembree, R., & Dessart, D.J. (1986). Effects of hand-held calculators in precollege mathematics education: a meta-analysis. Journalfor Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 83-89.
25.
Hodgkins, M. A. (1994). Students' understanding of the concept of variable: comparison of two teaching methods (Master's thesis, Christopher Newport University, 1994). Masters Abstracts International, 33, 06.
26.
Hodo, L. B. (1989). The effects of study skills instruction on achievement and usage of selected study strategies in Algebra II classes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 04A.
27.
Hutchinson, N., & Hemingway, P. (1987). (Res. Rep.). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED293272).
28.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
Keller,J. E. (1984). The effects of table-building problem solving procedures on students' understanding of variables in pre-algebra (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 06A.
30.
London, R. (1983). An inductive approach to algebra. The Mathematics Teacher, 76, 582-584.
31.
Lwo, L. S. (1992). Effects of individualized examples and personalized contexts in computer-based adaptive teaching of algebra word problems (Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 06A.
32.
Maccini, P., & Hughes, C.A. (2000). Effects of a problem-solving strategy on introductory algebra performance of secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15(1), 10-21.
33.
Maccini, P., & Ruhl, K.L. (2000). Effects of graduated instructional sequence on the algebra subtraction of integers by secondary students with learning disabilities. Education and the Treatment of Children, 23(4), 465-489.
34.
Makanong, A. (2000). The effects of constructivist approaches on ninth grade algebra achievement in Thailand secondary school students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 03A.
35.
Marcucci, R.G. (1980). A meta-analysis of research of teaching mathematical problem solving (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 06A.
36.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
37.
Matthews, S. M. (1997). The effects of using two variables when there are two unknowns in solving algebraic word problems. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(2), 122-135.
38.
McClung, L. W. (1998). A study on the use of manipulatives and their effect on student achievement in high school algebra class. (Res. Rep.). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED425077).
39.
McCoy, L. P., Baker, T. H., & Little, L. S. (1996). Using multiple representations to communicate: An algebra challenge. National Council of Teachers of Math Yearbook, 40-44.
40.
McGaw, B., & Glass, G. V. (1980). Choice of the metric for effect size in meta-analysis. American Education Research Journal, 17, 325-337.
41.
McIntosh, M. E. (1997). Guide students to better comprehension of word problems. The Clearing House, 71, 26-32.
42.
Midgett, C. W., & Eddins, S. K. (2001). NCTM's principles and standards for school mathematics: Implications for administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 85(623), 35-38.
43.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
44.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
45.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (H.R.1), 107 Cong., 110 (2002) (enacted).
46.
Parham,J. W. (1994). An analysis of the effects of tutoring on seventh grade students engaged in the mastery of pre-algebra concepts (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 11A.
47.
Patterson, A. (1999). Grasping graphing. Mathematics Teacher, 92(9), 758-762.
48.
Pierce, R. D. (1984). A quasi-experimental study of Saxon's incremental development model and its effects on student achievement in first-year algebra (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tulsa, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 2A.
49.
Pippen,J. F., and Carr, D. B. (1989). The effects of two reading methods in a content area upon ninth-grade, first-year algebra students' problem-solving performance of algebra word problems and reading achievement. (Res. Rep.). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED315306).
50.
Price, S., & Martin, L. (1997). The equation, the whole equation and nothing but the equation! One approach to the teaching of linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 159-181.
51.
Raymond, A. E., & Leinenbach, M. (2000). Collaborative action research on the learning and teaching of algebra: A story of one mathematics teacher's development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 283-307.
52.
Romberg, T. (1998). Comments: NCTM's curriculum and evaluation standards. Teachers College Record, 100(1), 8-21.
53.
Schumacker, R. E., Young, J. I., & Bembry, K. L. (1995). Math attitudes and achievement of algebra I students: A comparative study of computer assisted and traditional lecture methods of instruction. Computers in the Schools, 11(4), 27-33.
54.
Sergiovanni, T. S., & Starratt, R. J. (1993). Supervision: A redefinition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
55.
Smith, J. E. (2001). The effect of the Carnegie Algebra Tutor on student achievement and attitude in introductory high school algebra. Retrieved September 18, 2001, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04232001-161143/
56.
St. John, D. J. (1992). A comparison of two methods of teaching eighth grade pre-algebra students how to construct tables for use in solving selected mathematics problems (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 02A.
57.
Sutherland, R., & Rojano, T. (1993). A spreadsheet approach to solving algebra problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 353-383.
58.
Tenenbaum, G. (1986). The effect of quality of instruction on higher and lower mental processes and on the prediction of summative achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 105-114.
59.
Thomas, P. G., & Rickhuss, M. G. (1992). An experiment in the use of computer algebra in the classroom. Education and Computing, 8, 255-263.
60.
Walberg, H.J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19-27.
61.
Wilkins, C. W. (1993). The effects of using a problem solving approach to algebra I instruction. (Res. Rep.). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED372934).
62.
Wilson, L., & Blank, R. (1999). Improving mathematics education using results from NAEP and TIMSS. Washington, DC: State Education Assessment Center. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED346082)
63.
Wohlgehagen, K S. (1992). A comparison of the attitude and achievement in mathematics of algebra I students using computer-based and traditional instructional methods (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 12A.
64.
Yueh,J., & Alessi, S.M. (1988). The effect of reward structure and group ability composition on cooperative computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15(1), 18-22.
