To address the nation ' ongoing interest in student achievement, some researchers havefocused on the effect of block scheduling-a model in which students take fewer classes for longer periods of time. Although block scheduling has demonstrated its viability in high schools, little research has explored its effect at the middle level. Because the middle level years are often marked by a decline in student achievement, particularly during the transitional year when students movefrom elementary school to sixth grade, the current study was conducted. Results revealed significant increases in the mathematics achievement scores of sixth-grade students' enrolled in five middle level schools that transitioned fiom traditional to block schedules. Characteristics of block scheduling that may have accountedfor these outcomes and recommendations forfuture research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, W. M., & George, P. S. (1981). The exemplary middle school. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
2.
Alspaugh, J. W. (1998). Achievement loss associated with the transition to middle and high school. Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 20-25.
3.
Bevevino, M. M., Snodgrass, D. M., Adams, K M., & Dengel,J. A. (1998). An educator's guide to block scheduling: Decision making, curriculum design, and lesson planning strategies. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
Canady, R. L., & Rettig, M. D. (1995a). Block scheduling: A catalyst for change in high schools. Princeton, NJ: Eye on Education.
5.
Canady, R. L., & Rettig, M. D. (1995b). The power of innovative scheduling. Educational Leadership, 53(3), 4-10.
6.
Carroll, J. M. (1990). The Copernican plan: Restructuring the American high school. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(5), 358-365.
7.
Cawelti, G. (1994). High school restructuring: A national study. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
8.
Cobb, R. B., Abate, S., & Baker, D. (1999). Effects on students of a 4 x 4 junior high school block scheduling program. Education Policy Archives, 7(3). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n3.html
9.
Eccles,J. S., Lord, S., & Midgley, C. (1991). What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents. American Journal of Education, 89, 521-542.
10.
Freshcorn, E. L. (2000). School transition and students' academic growth in reading and mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
11.
Guskey, T., & Kifer, E. (1995, April). Evaluation of a high school block schedule restructuring program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
12.
Kramer, S. L. (1997). What we know about block scheduling and its effects on math instruction: Part I. NASSP Bulletin, 81(586), 18-42.
13.
Mizell, H. (2002). What parents need to know about middle school reform. New York: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED471909).
14.
National Middle School Association. (1995). This we believe. Columbus, OH: Author.
15.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (H.R. 1), 107 Cong., 110 (2002) (enacted).
16.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (1996). North Carolina end-of-grade tests: Reading comprehension and mathematics. (Tech. Rep. No. 1). Raleigh, NC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED406397).
17.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2000). Standard course of study. Raleigh, NC: Author.
18.
Queen, J. A. (2000). Block scheduling revisited. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(3), 214-222.
19.
Queen, J. A. (2003). The block scheduling handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
20.
Queen, J. A., Akos, P., & Lineberry, C. (in press). Successful student transition from elementary to middle school. New York: Eye on Education.
21.
Queen,J. A., Algozzine, B., & Eaddy, M. (1997). The road we traveled: Scheduling in the 4 x 4 block. NASSP Bulletin, 81(588), 88-99.
22.
Queen,J. A., Algozzine, B., & Isenhour, K. G. (1999). First year teachers and 4 x 4 block scheduling. NASSP Bulletin, 83(603), 100-103.
23.
Queen,J. A., & Isenhour, K G. (1998). The 4 x 4 block schedule. Princeton, NJ: Eye on Education.
24.
Sanford, E. E. (1996). North Carolina end-of-grade tests (Tech. Rep.). Raleigh, NC: Department of Public Instruction, Office of Instructional and Accountability Services, Division of Accountability/Testing.
25.
Shortt, T. L., & Thayer, Y V. (1999). The complete handbook of block scheduling. Bloomington, IN: Technos.
26.
Wronkovich, M., Hess, C. A., & Robinson, J. E. (1997). An objective look at math outcomes based on new research into block scheduling. NASSP Bulletin, 81(593), 32-41.
