Research on the effects of class size on achievement in high school has been plagued by methodological problems. Nonetheless, studies do show that small classes promote student engagement, enriched curricula, positive teacherstudent interaction, increased time on instruction rather than on discipline, and high teacher morale. All of these factors are as important for educating adolescents as they are for schooling younger children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achilles, C. M. (2001). Base restructuring efforts on a long-term experimental evidence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, April 10-14.
2.
Achilles, C. M., Finn,J. D., & Pate-Bain, H. (2002). Measuring class size: Let me count the ways. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 24-26.
3.
Achilles, C. M., Kiser-Kling, K., Aust, A., & Owen, J. (1995). Success starts small (SSS): A study of reduced class size in primary grades orfully Chapter-i eligible school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 18-22.
4.
Addonizio, M. F., & Phelps, J. L. (2000). Class size and student performance: A framework for policy analysis. Journal of Education Finance, 26, 135-156.
5.
Akerhielm, K. (1995). Does class size matter?Economics of Education Review, 14, 229-241.
6.
Biddle, B. J., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). Small class size and its effects. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 12-23.
7.
Bracey, G. W. (1999). Reducing class size: The findings, the controversy. Phi Delta Kappan, 8(1), 246-247.
8.
Bourke, S. (1986). How smaller is better: Some relationships between class size, teaching practices, and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 558-571.
9.
Carter, R. D. (1996). Obstacles to the effective teaching of writing: A 20-year follow-up. NASSP Bulletin, 81(591), 57-61.
10.
Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 465-498.
11.
Ferguson, R. F., & Ladd, H. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In H. R Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 256-298). Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
12.
Finn, J. (1998). Class size and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Institute on the Education of At-Risk Students, Office of Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
13.
Finn, J. (1999). Small classes have large benefits. High School Magazine, 6, 45-45.
14.
Finn, J., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 97-109.
15.
Finn,J. D., Gerber, S. B., Achilles, C., & Boyd-Zaharias,J. (2001). The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record, 103, 145-183.
16.
Finn,J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Achilles, C. M. (in press). The "whys" of class size: Student behavior in small classes. Review of Educational Research.
17.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996a). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396.
18.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996b). Interpreting research on school resources and student achievement: A rejoinder to Hanushek. Review of Educational Research, 66, 411-416.
19.
Grissmer, D. (1999). Class size effects: Assessing the evidence, its policy, implications, and future research agenda. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 231-248.
20.
Gursky, D. (1998). Class size counts. American Teacher, 82, 10-12.
21.
Hanushek, E. A. (1996). A more complete picture of school resource policies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 397-409.
22.
Holliday, W. G. (1992). Should we reduce class size? What the research really says. Science Teacher, 59, 14-17.
23.
Jacobson, J. (2001). Sizing up small classes. Education Week, 20(24), 26-28.
24.
Johnson, K. A. (2002). The downside to small class policies. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 27-29.
25.
Johnston, J. M. (1989). Teacher perceptions of changes in teaching when they have a small class or and aide. Peabody Journal of Education, 67, 106-122.
26.
Klonsky, M. (2002). How small schools prevent violence. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 65-69.
27.
Krueger, A. B., & Whitmore, D. M. (2001). The effect of attending a small class in the early grades on college test-taking and middle school test results: Evidence from project STAR. Economic Journal, 111, 1-28.
28.
McLaughlin, D., & Drori, G. (2000). School-level correlates of academic achievement: Student assessment scores in SASS public schools. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2, 62-65.
29.
Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas. Boston: Beacon Press.
30.
Miles, K H., & Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Rethinking the allocation of teaching resources: Some lessons from high performing schools. In W. J. Fowler, Jr. (Ed.), Developments in schoolfinance, 1997. Fiscal proceedings from the annual state data conference (July, 1997). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
31.
Mosteller, F., Light, R. J., & Sachs, J. A. (1996). Sustained inquiry in education: Lessons from skill grouping and class size. Harvard Education Review, 66, 797-842.
32.
Nye, B. A., Boyd-Zaharias,J., Fulton, B. D., & Wallenhorst, M. P. (1992). American School Board Journal, 179, 31-33.
33.
Nyhan, R. C., & Alkadry, M. G. (1999). The impact of school resources on student achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Finance, 25, 211-228.
34.
Pate-Bain, H., Achilles, C. M., Boyd-Zaharias, J., & McKenna, B. (1992). Class size does make a difference. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 253-256.
35.
Raimondo, H. J., Esposito, L., & Gershenberg, I. (1990). Introductory class size and student performance in intermediate theory courses. Journal of Economic Education, 21, 369-381.
36.
Rice, J. K. (1999). The impact of class size on instructional strategies and the use of time in high school mathematics and science courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 215-229.
37.
Robinson, G. E. (1990). Synthesis of research on the effects of class size. Educational Leadership, 47(7), 80-90.
38.
Verstegen, D. A., & King, R. A. (1998). The relationship between school spending and student achievement: A review and analysis of 35 years of production function research. Journal of Educational Finance, 24, 243-262.
39.
Wenglinsky, H. (1997). How money matters: The effect of school district spending on academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 221-237.
40.
Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Report of Research Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from www.ets.org/research/pic/pir/html
41.
Zahorik, J. A. (1999). Reducing class size leads to individualized instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 50-53.
