This article discusses the current role of the principal, how the role has changed, and how it should change. It also suggests that the principal shortage is an unintended consequence of these changes. In a national study, practitioners identified 45 descriptors of the principal's role. The analysis of the descriptors revealed four themes: role conflict, accountability conflict, autonomy conflict, and responsibility conflict.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Association of California School Administrators (2000, June 26). Study confirms principal shortage in California. Ed Cal29, (39). RetrievedJanuary 27, 2001, from http://www.acsa.org/publications/EDCAL/EDL_06_262000/principals.html
2.
Boyer, E. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America. New York: Harper & Row.
3.
Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education, appointed by the National Education Association. (1918). Cardinal principles of secondary education. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
4.
Educational Research Service. (1998). Is there a shortage of qualified candidates for openings in the principalship: An exploratory study. Retrieved May 7, 2001, from http://www.naesp.org/misc/shortage.htm
5.
Educational Research Service. (1999, February). Study of the principalship. ERS Bulletin, 26(6). Retrieved February 11, 2001, from http://www.ers.org/ERSBulletins/0299a.htm
6.
Educational Research Service. (2000). The principal, keystone of a highachieving school: Attracting and keeping the leaders we need. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
7.
Eggers, R. M., & Jones, C. M. (1998, March). Practical considerations for conducting Delphi studies. Educational Research Quarterly, 21, 52-66.
8.
Gilman, D. A., & Lanman-Givens, B. (2001). Where have all the principals gone?Educational Leadership, 58(8), 72-74.
9.
Goodwin, R. H. (2002). On the edge of chaos: A Delphi study of the changing role of the secondary principal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University. Available from http://etd.wvu.edu/templates/showetd.cfm?recnum=2301
10.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. EducationalAdministration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-45.
11.
Hough, J. (2000). Principal supply and demand report. Charleston, WV: West Virginia Department of Education.
12.
Hurley, J. C. (1992). Become a principal? You must be kidding. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Rural Education Association, Traverse City, MI.
13.
Institute for Educational Leadership. (2000, October). Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship. A Report of the Task Force on the Principalship. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 2001, from www.iel.org.
14.
Lewis, J., & Lee, S. (2000). The best job in the world. Northwest Education, 5(3), 34-39. Retrieved February 11, 2002, from http://www.nwrel.org/nwedu/spring00/text-job.html
15.
Lezotte, L. W. (1984, April). One perspective on an effective school's research agenda. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
16.
Mann, L. M. (2002). Selling the principalship. Principal, 82(1), 32-32.
17.
Marnik, G. (1998). Reflections on the high school principalship. The High School Magazine, 6(2), 4-9.
18.
Mendez, R. (1987). Now is the time to redefine the principalship. The Clearing House, 61, 172-174.
19.
Murphy, J. (1994). Redefining the principalship in restructuring schools. NASSP Bulletin, 79(560), 94-100.
20.
Murphy, J. (1998). What's ahead for tomorrow's principals. Principal, 78(1), 13-16.
21.
National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2001). Priorities and barriers in high school leadership: A survey of principals. A report prepared in conjunction with the Milken Family Foundation. Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved November 16, 2001, from http://www.principals.org/pdf/HSSurvey.pdf.
22.
National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration. (1987). Leaders for America's schools: The report of the National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration. Tempe, AZ: The University Council for Educational Administration.
23.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration for the Educational Leadership Council. (2001). Recognizing and encouraging exemplary leadership in America's schools: A proposal to establish a system of advanced certification for administrators. Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved February 28, 2002, from www.npbea.org/projects/able-project.htm
24.
Pellicer, L. O., Anderson, L. W., Keefe, J. W., Kelly, E. A., & McCleary, L. E. (1988). High school leaders and their schools: Vol. I. A national profile. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
25.
Pellicer, L. O., Anderson, L. W., Keefe, J. W., Kelly, E. A., & McCleary, L. E. (1990). High school leaders and their schools: Vol. II. Profiles of effectiveness. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
26.
Pigford, A. B. (1989, September). Will the principalship survive into the 21st century?Thrust forEducational Leadership, 19, 22-23.
27.
Portin, B. S. (2000, August). The changing urban principalship. Education and Urban Society, 32(4), 492-506.
28.
Portin, B. S., Shen, J., & Williams, R. C. (1998). The changing principalship and its impact: Voices from principals.
29.
Public Agenda. (2001). Trying to stay ahead of the game: Superintendents and principals talk about school leadership. A report prepared by Public Agenda. Retrieved December 8, 2001, from http://www.publicagenda.org/specials/leadership/leadership.htm
30.
Sennett, F. (2001). Do you have what it takes to be an effective school leader: An interview with Kevin McGuire. Curriculum Review, 41(4), 14-16.
31.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Eliminating barriers to improving teaching. A report from the U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved February 11, 2002, from www.ed.gov/inits/teachers/barriers2000/Barriers2000.pdf
32.
Williams, R., & Portin, B. (1997, April). The changing role of the principal in Washington state. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
33.
Wulff, K. L. (1996). The changing role of the principal in Washington state. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington) Dissertations Abstract International, 156/09A, 3778.
34.
Yerkes, D. L., & Guaglianone, C. L. (1998). Where have all the high school administrators gone?Thrust for Educational Leadership, 28(2), 10-15.
35.
Ziglio, E. (1996). The Delphi method and its contribution to decisionmaking. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health (pp. 3-33). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
