The academic and political arguments about teacher quality affect how secondary principals do their jobs. Educational research provides useful guidance about which teacher candidates may be most likely to increase student achievement, but it must be used critically and cautiously. When individuals with varying political agendas interpret the same findings in completely different ways to advance very different solutions, confusion results. Principals who understand the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 know how to create and maintain a positive work and learning environment for teachers and students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Archer,J. (2002, April 3). Research: Focusing in on teachers. Education Week, 21(29), 36-39. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/newstory.cfm?slug=29teachquality.h21
2.
Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1999). Teacher training and licensure: A layman's guide. In M. Kanstoroom and C. E. Finn, Jr. (Eds), Better teachers, better schools (pp. 31-82). Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
3.
Barton, P., Coley, R., & Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Order in the classroom: Violence, discipline, and student achievement. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4.
Berry, B. (2001). No shortcuts to preparing good teachers. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 32-36.
5.
Blair, J. (2000, October 25). ETS study links effective teaching methods to test-score gains. Education Week, 20(8), 24-25. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=08ets.h20
6.
Blair, J. (2002, March 6). Teacher-trainers fear a backfire from new ESEA. Education Week, 21(25), pp.1-1, 38-38, 39-39. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=25teach.h21&keywords=Teacher%2Dtrainers%20fear%20a%20backfire%20from%20new%20ESEA
7.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1
8.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The research and rhetoric on teacher certification: A response to 'Teacher Certification Reconsidered'. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, October 15: 1-71. Retrieved from http://www.nctaf.org.
9.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Ball, D. L., (1997). Teaching for high standards. What policymakers need to know and be able to do. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel. Retrieved from http://www.negp.gov/reports/highstds.htm
10.
Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thoreson, A. (2001, Spring). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis23(1), 57-77.
11.
Educational Testing Service. (2002). A national priority: Americans speak on teacher quality. Public opinion research conducted by Peter D. Hart and Robert M. TeeterPrinceton, NJ: Author. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.ets.org/pub/corp/survey2002.pdf
12.
Ferguson, R. F. (1991, Summer). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2), 465-498.
13.
Gardner, H. (2002, September 4). The quality and qualities of educational research. Education Week, 22(1), pp. 72-72, 49-49. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=Olgardner.h22
14.
Gerwertz, C. (2002, September 11). Federal law spurs urban districts to search for "qualified" teachers. Education Week, 22(2), pp. 1-1, 14-15.
15.
Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (1999). Teacher licensing and student achievement. In M. Kanstoroom & C. E. Finn, Jr. (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. 683-702).Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
16.
Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000, Summer). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis22(2), 129-145.
17.
Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2001, Spring). Evaluating the evidence on teacher certification: A rejoinder. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis23(1), 79-86.
18.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L., & Laine, R. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research66, 361-396.
19.
Guyton, E., & Farokhi, E. (1987). Relationships among academic performance, basic skills, and subject matter knowledge and teaching skills of teacher education graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 37-42.
20.
Haycock, K. (1998, Summer). Good teaching matters...a lot. Thinking K-16, 3(2), 3-14.
21.
Haycock, K., Jerald, C., & Huang, S. (2001). Closing the gap: Done in a decade. Thinking K-16, 5(2), 3-22.
22.
Hess, F. M. (2001). Tear down this wall: The case for a radical overhaul of teacher certification. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.ppionline.org/ppi-ci.cfm?knlgArealD=110&subsecID=I35&contentlD=3964
23.
Hess, F. M. (2002, September 3). Advocacy in the guise of research: The Laczko-Kerr-Berliner study of teacher certification. 21st Century Schools Project Bulletin, 2(18). Retrieved from http://www.ppionline.org/ppici.cfm?cp=l&knlgAreaID=110&subsecid=900001&contentid=250847
24.
Huang, S., Yun, Y., & Haycock, K. (2002) Interpret with caution: The first state Title II reports on the quality of teacher preparation. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
25.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bulletin, 86(631), 16-31.
26.
Johnson, K. A. (2000). The effects of advanced teacher training in education on student achievement. Heritage Foundation Center for Data Analysis report No. 00-09. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/Research/Education/CDAOO-09.cfm
27.
Jordan, H. R., Mendro, R. L., & Weerasinghe, D. (1997, July). Teacher Effects on Longitudinal Student Achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation, Indianapolis, IN.
28.
Kanstoroom, M., & Finn, C. E.,Jr. (Eds.). (1999). Better teachers, better schools. Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
29.
Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W. A. (2001). Enhancing teacher and teaching quality: Recommendations for principals. NASSP Bulletin85(628), 64-73.
30.
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. C. (2002, September 6). The effectiveness of "Teach for America" and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(37). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n37/
31.
Lewis, L., Parsad, B., Carey, N., Bartfai, N., Farris, E., & Smeardon, B. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Education Statistics Quarterly, 1(1). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs99/quarterlyapr/2-feature/2-esql1-a.html
32.
McDiarmid, G. W., & Wilson, S. (1991). An exploration of the subject matter knowledge of alternative route teachers: Can we assume they know their subject?Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 32-35.
33.
Mitchell, R., & Barth, P. (1999) How teacher licensing tests fall short. Thinking K-16, 3(1), 3-16. Retrieved from http://www.edtrust.org/main/documents/kl6_spring99.pdf
34.
Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject matter preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125-145.
35.
Monk, D. H., & King,J. A. (1994). Multi-level teacher resource effects in pupil performance in secondary mathematics and science: The case of teacher subject matter preparation. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Choices and consequences: Contemporary policy issues in education (pp. 29-58). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
36.
Munro, J. (1999, June). Learning more about learning improves teacher effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(2), 151-171.
37.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (H.R. 1), 107 Cong., 110 (2002) (enacted).
38.
Progressive Policy Institute. (2002, September 3). New teacher quality studies: Putting lipstick on a pig. 21st Century Schools Project Bulletin, 2(18). Retrieved from http://www.ppionline.org/ppi-ci.cfm?cp=1&knigArealD=110&subsecid=900001&contentid=250847
39.
Rowan, B., Chiang, F. S., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teacher on student achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 256-284.
40.
Sanders, W., & Rivers, J. (1996, November). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee, Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
41.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. New York: Pergamon.
42.
U. S. Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge: The secretary's annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Office of Postsecondary Education.
43.
Walsh, K. (2001). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling-for quality. Baltimore, MD: The Abell Foundation. Retrieved from www.abell.org/publications/detail.asp?ID=61
44.
Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters. Bringing the classroom back into Discussions of teacher quality. A policy information center report. Princeton, NJ: The Milken Family Foundation and Educational Testing Service.
45.
Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Scientifically based research on teacher quality: Research on teacher preparation and professional development. Presented to White House Conference on Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers, March 5, 2002. Published as Appendix C of Improving Teacher Quality State Grants. Title II, Part A. Non-Regulatory Draft Guidance. Washington. DC: U. S. Department of Education. Available online at: www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/SIP/TitleIIguidance2002.doc
46.
Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider's view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 190-204.
