This study shows a strong relationship between students' state assessment test pass rates and students' socioeconomic status (SES). State sanctions based on assessment scores can affect graduation, student diplomas, school accreditation, schoolfunding, teacher rewards and promotion, paperwork requirements, regulations, work expectations, improvement plans, and even real estate values. Voters must not endorse legislation and policy that penalize low SES communities and their constituency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bohn, A., & Sleeter, C. (2000, October). Multicultural education and the standards movement. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(2), 156-159.
2.
Brady, M. (2000, May). The standards juggernaut. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(9), 648-651.
3.
Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
4.
Duke, D. L., Tucker, P., & Heinecke, W. (2000, April). Initial responses of Virginia high schools to the accountability initiative: A policy perspective paper. Charlottesville, VA: Thomas Jefferson Center for Educational Design at the University of Virginia.
5.
Dunne, D. W. (2000, June). Should standardized tests determine who is held back?Education World. Retrieved April 24, 2002, from http://www.education-world.com/aissues/issueO89.shtml
6.
Hanushek, E. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45-51, 62-62.
7.
Harrington-Lueker, D. (2000, January). The uneasy coexistence of high stakes and developmental practice. AASA School Administrator, 57(1), 6-11.
8.
Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effect of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5-14.
9.
Hoff, D. J. (2000). Testing foes hope to stoke middle-class ire. Education Week, 19(28), 24-31.
10.
Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.
11.
McColskey, W., & McMunn, N. (2000). Strategies for dealing with highstakes state tests. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(2), 115-120.
12.
McNeil, L. M. (2000). Creating new inequalities: Contradictions of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(10), 728-734.
13.
Meyers, E., & Rust, F. O. (2000). The test doesn't tell all. Education Week, 19(38), 34-37.
14.
Morse, J. (2000). Is that your final answer?Time, 155(25), 34-38.
15.
Olsen, L. (2000, April 5). Worries of a standards backlash grow. Education Week, 19(30), 1-1, 12-13.
16.
Payne, K., & Biddle, B. (2000). Funding, poverty, and mathematics achievement: A rejoinder to Sarah E. Turner. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 27-29.
17.
Popham, W. J. (1999, March). Why standardized tests don't measure education quality. Educational Leadership, 56(6), 8-17.
18.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Accreditation in the U.S. Retrieved April 23, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OPE/accreditation/accredus.html
19.
Viadero, D. (2000, May 3). High stakes tests lead debate at researcher's gathering. Education Week, 19(34), 6-6.
20.
Virginia Department of Education (VA-DOE). (2000). Virginia profile. Richmond, VA: Author.
21.
Wiggins, G. (1999). Assessing student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Wright, E. O. (1997). Class counts. Comparative studies in class analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Zehr, M. A. (2000). Poorer schools still lagging behind on Internet access, study finds. Education Week, 19(24), 5-5.
