Student retention and social promotion are failed strategies that are also expensive. Although public support for high standards in schools is increasing, educators are concerned that students who cannot meet academic criteria may instead choose to drop out of school. Failure-prevention approaches are crucial to ensure that all students succeed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cawelti, G.1999. Portraits of six benchmark schools: Diverse approaches to improving student achievement. Arlington, Va.: Education Research Service.
2.
Gandal, M., and J. Vranek. 2001. Standards: Here today, here tomorrow. Educational Leadership59 (1), 7-13.
3.
Goodlad, J.1954. Some effects of promotion and non-promotion upon the social and personal adjustment of children. Journal of Experimental Education22, 301-328.
4.
Grissom,J. B., and L. A. Shepard. 1989. Repeating and dropping out of school. In Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention, edited by L. A. Shepard and M. L. Smith. London: Falmer Press.
5.
Hoff, D.1999. Lessons of a century: Made to measure. Education Week, 16 June.
6.
Hoff, D.2000. Polls dispute a 'backlash' to standards. Education Week, 11 October, 1, 16-17.
7.
Lenarduzzi, G., and T. E McLaughlin. 1990. The effects of nonpromotion in junior high school on academic achievement and scholastic effort. Reading Improvement27 (3): 212-217.
8.
Lenarduzzi, G., and T. E McLaughlin. 1992. Longitudinal effects of nonpromotion in junior high school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, 2-5 January, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
9.
Maxwell, W. H.1904. Sixth annual report of the superintendent of schools. New York: New York City Board of Education.
10.
Meisels, S.J., and F. Liaw. 1993. Failure in grade: Do retained students catch up?Journal of Educational Research87 (2): 69-77.
11.
National Commission Report on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
12.
Olson, L.2001. Quality counts explores standards in the classroom. Education Week 10January, 3.
13.
Otto, H. J.1951. Grading and promotion policies. NEA Journal40: 128-129.
14.
Owings, W., and L. Kaplan. 2000. Learning of standards. Virginia ASGLD3 (2):6-6.
15.
Owings, W., and L. Kaplan. 2001. Alternatives to retention and social promotion. Bloomington, Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa.
Reynolds, A. J.1992. Grade retention and school adjustment: An explanatory analysis. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis14: 101-121.
18.
Slavin, R. E. and N. A. Madden. 1989. What works for students at-risk: A research synthesis. Educational Leadership46: 4-13.
19.
Thomas, A. M., L. Armistead, T. Kempton, S. Lynch, R. Forehand, S. Nousiainen, B. Neighbors, and L. Tannenbaum. 1992. Early retention: Are there long-term beneficial effects?Psychology in the Schools29 (4): 342-347.
20.
Thorndike, E. L.1908. Elimination of pupils from school. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of Education, Education Bulletin.
21.
Travers, R.1983. How research changed American schools: A history from 1840 to the present. Kalamazoo, Mich.: Mythos Press.
