Three major approaches for distance learning strategies are identified: course supplement, online lecture and correspondence, and the Concord model, based on the centrality of asynchronous student collaboration. Eight design characteristics of the Concord model that fit together to create a practical, powerful design for online courses are detailed. Experiences in applying this model to student courses, teacher professional development, and online course developers are summarized.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, eds. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
3.
Collison, G., B. Elbaum, S. Haavind, and R. Tinker. 2000. Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, Wis.: Atwood Publishing.
4.
Halloun, I. A., and D. Hestenes. 1985. The initial state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics53 (11): 1043-1055.
5.
Harasim, L., S. R. Hiltz, L. Teles, and M. Turoff. 1995. Learning networks. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6.
Hoadley, C. M., and R. D. Pea. 2001. Finding the ties that bind: Tools in support of a knowledge-building community. In Building virtual communities, edited by K. A. Renninger and W. Shumar. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Hsi, S., and C. M. Hoadley. 1997. Productive discussion in science: Gender equity through electronic discourse. Journal of Science Education and Technology6 (1): 23-36.
8.
Hsi, S., and R. Rose. 1999. Large-scale online teacher professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Educational Computing Conference, 24 June, Atlantic City, N.J.
9.
Hsi, S., and R. Tinker. 1997. A scalable model of collaborative learning: The Virtual High School Consortium. Proceedings from CSCL ‘97, the International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, OISE, 10-14 December, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
10.
Kozma, R., A. Zucker, C. Espinoza, R. McGhee, L. Yarnall, D. Zalles, and A. Lesis. 1998. An evaluation of the Virtual High School after one year of operation. Available: http://vhs.concord.org/Pages/About+Us-Project+Evaluation.
11.
Kozma, R., A. Zucker, C. Espinoza, R. McGhee, L. Yarnall, D. Zalles, and A. Lesis. 1999a. An evaluation of the Virtual High School after two years of operation. Available: http://vhs.concord.org/Pages/About+Us-Project+Evaluation.
12.
Kozma, R., A. Zucker, C. Espinoza, R. McGhee, L. Yarnall, D. Zalles, and A. Lesis. 1999b. An expert panel review of the quality of Virtual High School courses: Final report. Available: http://vhs.concord.org/Pages/About+Us-Project+Evaluation.
13.
Kozma, R., A. Zucker, C. Espinoza, R. McGhee, L. Yarnall, D. Zalles, and A. Lesis. 2000. The online course experience: Evaluation of the Virtual High School’s third year of implementation, 1999-2000 final report. Available: http://vhs.concord.org/Pages/About+Us-Project+Evaluation.
14.
McRobbie, C., and K. Tobin. 1997. A social constructivist perspective on learning environments. International Journal of Science Education19: 193-208.
15.
Schmidt, W. H., C. C. McKnight, and S. A. Raizen, eds. 1997. A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherlands; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16.
Tinker, R., and S. Haavind. 1996. Netcourses and netseminars: Current practice and new designs. The Journal of Science Education and Technology5 (3): 217-223.
