A quasi-experimental study was conducted on whether family involvement in homework in the middle grades benefits students. Results suggest that well-designed interactive homework assignments positively engage parents and promote student achievement. Findings should be useful to middle school administrators and teachers for improving curriculum decisions and homework designs in science.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). 2001. How to make homework more meaningful [Videotape]. Alexandria, Va.: ASCD.
2.
Balli, S. J. 1995. The effects of differential prompts on family involvement with middle-grades homework. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia.
3.
Balli, S. J., D. H. Demo, and J. F. Wedman. 1998. Family involvement with children’s homework: An intervention in the middle grades. Family Relations47: 142-146.
4.
Connors, L. J., and J. L. Epstein. 1994. Taking stock: Views of teachers, parents, and students on school, family, and community partnerships in high schools. Report 25. Baltimore: Center on Families, Communities, Schools, and Children’s Learning, Johns Hopkins University.
5.
Cooper, H.1989. Homework. White Plains, N.Y.: Longman.
6.
Cooper, H., J. J. Lindsay, and B. Nye. 2000. Homework in the home: How student, family, and parenting-style differences relate to the homework process. Contemporary Educational Psychology25: 464-487.
7.
Cooper, H., J. J. Lindsay, B. Nye, and S. Greathouse. 1998. Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology90: 70-83.
8.
Dauber, S. L., and J. L. Epstein. 1993. Parents’ attitudes and practices of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. In Families and schools in a pluralistic society, edited by N. Chavkin. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
9.
Epstein, J. L.1988. Homework practices, achievement, and behaviors of elementary school students. Report 26. Baltimore: Center on Families, Communities, Schools, and Children’s Learning, Johns Hopkins University.
10.
Epstein, J. L.2001. School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
11.
Epstein, J. L., and S. L. Dauber. 1991. School programs and teacher practices of parent involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. The Elementary School Journal91 (3): 289-305.
12.
Epstein, J. L., and S. Lee. 1995. National patterns of school and family connections in the middle grades. In The family-school connection: Theory, research, and practice, edited by B. Ryan, G. Adams, T. Gulotta, R. Weissberg, and R. Hampton. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
13.
Epstein, J. L., K. C. Salinas, and V. E. Jackson. 1995a. Manual for teachers and prototype activities: Teachers Involve Parents in Schoolwork (TIPS) language arts, science/health, and math interactive homework in the middle grades. Revised ed.Baltimore: Center on School, Family, and Community Partnerships, Johns Hopkins University.
14.
Epstein, J. L., K. C. Salinas, and V. E. Jackson. 1995b. TIPS language arts, math, and science prototype activities for grades 6, 7, and 8. Revised ed.Baltimore: Center on School, Family, and Community Partnerships, Johns Hopkins University.
15.
Epstein, J. L., B. S. Simon, and K. C. Salinas. 1997. Effects of Teachers Involve Parents in Schoolwork (TIPS) language arts interactive homework in the middle grades. Phi Delta Kappa Research Bulletin18 (September).
16.
Epstein, J. L., and F. L. Van Voorhis. 2001. More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist36 (3): 181-193.
17.
Fehrmann, P. G., T. Z. Keith, and T. M. Reimers. 1987. Home influences on school learning: Direct and indirect effects of parental involvement on high school grades. Journal of Educational Research80: 330-337.
18.
Ho, E. S., and J. D. Willms. 1996. Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education69: 126-141.
19.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., A. B. Battiato, J. M. Walker, R. P. Reed, J. M. DeJong, and K. P. Jones. 2001. Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist36 (3).
20.
Jenson, W. R., S. M. Sheridan, D. Olympia, and D. Andrews. 1994. Homework and students with learning disabilities and behavior disorders: A practical, parent-based approach. Journal of Learning Disabilities27 (2): 538-548.
21.
Keith, T. Z., P. B. Keith, G. C. Troutman, P. G. Bickley, P. S. Trivette, and K. Singh. 1993. Does parental involvement affect eighth grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. School Psychology Review22: 474-496.
22.
Lee, S. 1994. Family-school connections and students’ education: Continuity and change of family involvement from the middle grades to high school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
23.
Levin, I., R. Levy-Shiff, T. Appelbaum-Peled, I. Katz, M. Komar, and N. Meiran. 1997. Antecedents and consequences of maternal involvement in children’s homework: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology18: 207-222.
24.
Pribble, C. J. 1993. A homework survey of regular education and special education teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
25.
Simon, B. 2000. Predictors of high school and family partnerships and the influence of partnerships on student success. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
26.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2001. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 1984 and 1999 long-term trend assessment. Indicator 22. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
27.
Van Voorhis, F. L. 2000. The effects of TIPS interactive and non-interactive homework on science achievement and family involvement of middle grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.
